Ansem

Person ELEVATED RISK

Median of LLM-reported scores reflecting strong influence and occasional genuine market insight offset by repeated, well-documented retail harm from memecoin promotions.

Generated: 22/02/2026, 16:11:15
Research date: 2026-02-22
Sources: Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini
Slug: ansem
Overall Risk Score
50/100
Higher score indicates higher observed risk in this dossier.
Claims: 2
Timeline: 3
Red flags: 1
Evidence gaps: 1

Identity & Background

Known attributes linked to the subject profile.

Field Value
Verified Name Zion Thomas
Handles
Email Addresses N/A
Locations
  • New York City, NY, USA
Verification Status high
Source Ids SRC-001 · SRC-002 · SRC-009

Risk Assessment

Model-level score reasoning and risk dimensions.

Overall Score
50
Score Reasoning
Median of LLM-reported scores reflecting strong influence and occasional genuine market insight offset by repeated, well-documented retail harm from memecoin promotions.
Criminal Risk
none found
Financial Risk
high
Reputational Risk
high
Verification Risk
moderate
Source Ids

Claim Ledger

Complete claims table with expandable corroboration notes.

Claim Source Confidence Status
Real name is Zion Thomas. Media profiles and interviews high verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Confirmed by CoinDesk, The Block, and CoinTelegraph.
Notes: Consistent across multiple independent outlets.
Flagged by: Claude, GPT, Gemini
Source IDs: SRC-001 · SRC-002 · SRC-004
Known for early promotion of Dogwifhat (WIF) at approximately $100,000 market capitalization. Media reports and interviews high verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Documented by CoinDesk and DailyCoin.
Notes: Often cited as a defining success.
Flagged by: Claude, GPT, Grok
Source IDs: SRC-001 · SRC-006

Timeline of Events

Chronology with full event text and annotations.

2017

Entered cryptocurrency trading

Began trading cryptocurrency after early career in software engineering.

Sources: Media interviews

Source IDs: SRC-009

2024-10

Public accusations by ZachXBT

ZachXBT accused Ansem of facilitating pump-and-dump schemes involving low-cap memecoins.

Notes: Ansem disputed characterization but acknowledged incentive misalignment.

Sources: CoinTelegraph · Yahoo Finance

Source IDs: SRC-003 · SRC-004

2025-03

Kanye West interaction

Ye posted publicly requesting a meeting with Ansem, naming him Zion Thomas.

Notes: Tweet later deleted.

Sources: Crypto Briefing

Source IDs: SRC-005

Critical Red Flags

High-impact concerns surfaced by at least one model.

Pattern of low-cap memecoin promotion

Repeated promotion of micro-cap tokens that later declined 97–99% from all-time highs, with allegations that retail traders served as exit liquidity.

Severity: high · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
ZachXBT investigations, Media reports of token collapses

Sources: CoinTelegraph · Yahoo Finance · DailyCoin

Source IDs: SRC-003 · SRC-004 · SRC-006

Behavioral Patterns

Recurring motifs across time, claims, and operations.

Survivorship-bias defense

Consistently highlights exceptional winners such as WIF while downplaying or dismissing numerous failed promotions.

Frequency: recurrent

Project History

Portfolio-level outcomes and operational trajectory.

Crypto influencer and trader (@blknoiz06)

2017-present

Public crypto trading commentary and memecoin promotion, primarily on X.

Outcome: Large following and significant influence; substantial controversy.

Sources: CoinDesk · Yahoo Finance · DailyCoin

Source IDs: SRC-001 · SRC-003 · SRC-006

Contradictions & Disputes

Where narratives conflict and what is unresolved.

Claim A

Ansem facilitates pump-and-dump schemes.

Source: ZachXBT via media

Claim B

Ansem argues he is transparently trading what retail wants and denies running scams.

Source: Ansem statements at Messari Mainnet

Resolution: Unresolved; evidence supports substantial retail losses regardless of intent. · Confidence: high

Key Insights

Synthesis highlights from all available model outputs.

Influence-driven financial risk

Regardless of intent, Ansem’s scale of influence repeatedly coincided with severe losses for retail participants in low-cap memecoins.

Importance: critical

Evidence Gaps

What remains unknown and what needs corroboration.

Exact pre- and post-promotion wallet positioning for all promoted tokens.

Why uncertain: No comprehensive on-chain forensic report linking all wallets.

What was searched: Public investigations and media reports

Confidence Notes

Data-quality and uncertainty indicators from the distillation step.

Data Completeness
Moderate; major claims well-sourced, wallet-level details incomplete.
Source Verification
High; relies on established crypto media and investigators.
Identity Confidence
High
Timeline Confidence
High
Conflicting Findings
Disagreement centers on intent versus impact of promotions.
Limitations
Lack of exhaustive on-chain attribution for all promoted assets.

Source References

Collected references/links from all source-like fields in the distilled payload.

Data Preservation Annex

Raw distilled payload is attached to avoid information loss or truncation.

No additional top-level fields beyond rendered sections.

Full JSON payload
{
  "subject_name": "Ansem",
  "type": "person",
  "overall_score": 50,
  "research_sources": "Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini",
  "research_date": "2026-02-22",
  "source_registry": [
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-001",
      "url": "https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2024/12/10/ansem-the-memecoin-king",
      "title": "Ansem: The Memecoin King",
      "publisher": "CoinDesk",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-002",
      "url": "https://www.theblock.co/post/319090/crypto-trader-ansem-says-there-was-a-misalignment-of-incentives-in-certain-celebrity-backed-memecoins",
      "title": "Crypto trader Ansem says there was a 'misalignment of incentives' in certain celebrity-backed memecoins",
      "publisher": "The Block",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-003",
      "url": "https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-influencer-ansem-accused-promoting-133112274.html",
      "title": "Crypto Influencer Ansem Accused of Promoting Memecoin 'Pump and Dumps'",
      "publisher": "Yahoo Finance",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-004",
      "url": "https://cointelegraph.com/news/zachxbt-slams-crypto-influencer-over-memecoin-promotions",
      "title": "ZachXBT Accuses Crypto Influencer Ansem of Promoting Memecoin Pump-and-Dumps",
      "publisher": "CoinTelegraph",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-005",
      "url": "https://cryptobriefing.com/kanye-west-crypto-meeting/",
      "title": "Kanye Asks Meme Coin Trader Ansem to Meet, Fueling Account Sale Debate",
      "publisher": "Crypto Briefing",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-006",
      "url": "https://dailycoin.com/is-ansem-running-pump-and-dumps-crypto-influencer-under-fire/",
      "title": "Is Ansem Running Pump and Dumps? Crypto Influencer Under Fire",
      "publisher": "DailyCoin",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-007",
      "url": "https://99bitcoins.com/news/altcoins/what-happened-to-ansem-crypto-has-blknoiz06-really-been-arrested/",
      "title": "What Happened to Ansem Crypto? Has Blknoiz06 Really Been Arrested?",
      "publisher": "99Bitcoins",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-008",
      "url": "https://www.unchainedcrypto.com/why-memecoins-have-been-2024s-most-profitable-crypto-trade-ansem-and-kelxyz-ep-641/",
      "title": "Why Memecoins Have Been 2024's Most Profitable Crypto Trade: Ansem and Kelxyz",
      "publisher": "Unchained",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "SRC-009",
      "url": "https://tradersunion.com/persons/ansem/",
      "title": "Ansem: Biography, Career, and Business Insights",
      "publisher": "Traders Union",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    }
  ],
  "identity": {
    "verified_name": "Zion Thomas",
    "handles": [
      "@blknoiz06",
      "@conzimp"
    ],
    "email_addresses": [],
    "locations": [
      "New York City, NY, USA"
    ],
    "verification_status": "high",
    "source_ids": [
      "SRC-001",
      "SRC-002",
      "SRC-009"
    ]
  },
  "credentials_and_claims": [
    {
      "claim": "Real name is Zion Thomas.",
      "source": "Media profiles and interviews",
      "verified": true,
      "verification_evidence": "Confirmed by CoinDesk, The Block, and CoinTelegraph.",
      "verification_status": "verified",
      "confidence": "high",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "notes": "Consistent across multiple independent outlets.",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-002",
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Known for early promotion of Dogwifhat (WIF) at approximately $100,000 market capitalization.",
      "source": "Media reports and interviews",
      "verified": true,
      "verification_evidence": "Documented by CoinDesk and DailyCoin.",
      "verification_status": "verified",
      "confidence": "high",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok"
      ],
      "notes": "Often cited as a defining success.",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "project_history": [
    {
      "name": "Crypto influencer and trader (@blknoiz06)",
      "period": "2017-present",
      "description": "Public crypto trading commentary and memecoin promotion, primarily on X.",
      "funding": "N/A",
      "outcome": "Large following and significant influence; substantial controversy.",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "750,000+ followers on X",
      "team_members": [],
      "controversies": [
        "Pump-and-dump accusations",
        "Retail losses on promoted tokens"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "CoinDesk",
        "Yahoo Finance",
        "DailyCoin"
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-003",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "timeline": [
    {
      "date": "2017",
      "title": "Entered cryptocurrency trading",
      "description": "Began trading cryptocurrency after early career in software engineering.",
      "sources": [
        "Media interviews"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-009"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2024-10",
      "title": "Public accusations by ZachXBT",
      "description": "ZachXBT accused Ansem of facilitating pump-and-dump schemes involving low-cap memecoins.",
      "sources": [
        "CoinTelegraph",
        "Yahoo Finance"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "Ansem disputed characterization but acknowledged incentive misalignment.",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-003",
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-03",
      "title": "Kanye West interaction",
      "description": "Ye posted publicly requesting a meeting with Ansem, naming him Zion Thomas.",
      "sources": [
        "Crypto Briefing"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "Tweet later deleted.",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-005"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "red_flags": [
    {
      "title": "Pattern of low-cap memecoin promotion",
      "description": "Repeated promotion of micro-cap tokens that later declined 97–99% from all-time highs, with allegations that retail traders served as exit liquidity.",
      "severity": "high",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "ZachXBT investigations",
        "Media reports of token collapses"
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "Ansem cites WIF success as justification"
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "CoinTelegraph",
        "Yahoo Finance",
        "DailyCoin"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-003",
        "SRC-004",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "behavioral_patterns": [
    {
      "title": "Survivorship-bias defense",
      "description": "Consistently highlights exceptional winners such as WIF while downplaying or dismissing numerous failed promotions.",
      "examples": [
        "Public defense during ZachXBT dispute"
      ],
      "frequency": "recurrent",
      "confidence": "high",
      "sources": [
        "Media interviews"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-002",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "contradictions_and_disputes": [
    {
      "claim_1": "Ansem facilitates pump-and-dump schemes.",
      "claim_2": "Ansem argues he is transparently trading what retail wants and denies running scams.",
      "source_1": "ZachXBT via media",
      "source_2": "Ansem statements at Messari Mainnet",
      "resolution": "Unresolved; evidence supports substantial retail losses regardless of intent.",
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-002",
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    {
      "question": "Exact pre- and post-promotion wallet positioning for all promoted tokens.",
      "why_uncertain": "No comprehensive on-chain forensic report linking all wallets.",
      "searched": "Public investigations and media reports",
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "key_insights": [
    {
      "title": "Influence-driven financial risk",
      "description": "Regardless of intent, Ansem’s scale of influence repeatedly coincided with severe losses for retail participants in low-cap memecoins.",
      "importance": "critical",
      "evidence": [
        "Multiple tokens falling 97–99% after promotion"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "SRC-003",
        "SRC-004",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "risk_assessment": {
    "overall_score": 50,
    "score_reasoning": "Median of LLM-reported scores reflecting strong influence and occasional genuine market insight offset by repeated, well-documented retail harm from memecoin promotions.",
    "criminal_risk": "none found",
    "financial_risk": "high",
    "reputational_risk": "high",
    "verification_risk": "moderate",
    "source_ids": [
      "SRC-001",
      "SRC-003",
      "SRC-004",
      "SRC-006"
    ]
  },
  "confidence_notes": {
    "data_completeness": "Moderate; major claims well-sourced, wallet-level details incomplete.",
    "source_verification": "High; relies on established crypto media and investigators.",
    "identity_confidence": "High",
    "timeline_confidence": "High",
    "conflicting_findings": "Disagreement centers on intent versus impact of promotions.",
    "limitations": "Lack of exhaustive on-chain attribution for all promoted assets."
  }
}