Flying Tulip ($FT)

Project HIGH RISK

Median of divergent LLM assessments reflecting high execution, smart contract, and financial risk offset by novel investor protections and credible founder track record.

Generated: 22/02/2026, 17:33:21
Research date: 2026-02-22
Sources: Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini
Slug: flying-tulip
Overall Risk Score
70/100
Higher score indicates higher observed risk in this dossier.
Claims: 3
Timeline: 3
Red flags: 3
Evidence gaps: 2

Identity & Background

Known attributes linked to the subject profile.

Field Value
Verified Name Flying Tulip
Handles
Email Addresses N/A
Locations
  • Global (US, Europe, Asia team presence claimed)
Verification Status high
Source Ids S01 · S05 · S13

Risk Assessment

Model-level score reasoning and risk dimensions.

Overall Score
70
Score Reasoning
Median of divergent LLM assessments reflecting high execution, smart contract, and financial risk offset by novel investor protections and credible founder track record.
Criminal Risk
none found
Financial Risk
high
Reputational Risk
medium-high
Verification Risk
medium
Source Ids
S01 · S02 · S07 · S09

Claim Ledger

Complete claims table with expandable corroboration notes.

Claim Source Confidence Status
Flying Tulip is a full-stack on-chain exchange unifying spot trading, perpetuals, options, lending, a delta-neutral stablecoin (ftUSD), and on-chain insurance into a single cross-margin system. Project documentation and media interviews medium partially verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Only ftUSD and margin lending launched as of report date; other components described as forthcoming.
Notes: Product scope is aspirational; execution incomplete.
Flagged by: Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini
Source IDs: S01 · S03 · S05 · S13
Primary-sale participants receive a Perpetual PUT redemption right allowing them to burn FT to reclaim original principal from an on-chain reserve. Flying Tulip sale documentation high verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Mechanism described in docs; ftPUT ERC-721 referenced; reserve deployment described.
Notes: Protection is conditional and capped by reserve availability.
Flagged by: Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini
Source IDs: S01 · S06 · S07 · S12
Total token supply is fixed at 10,000,000,000 FT with zero inflation. Token documentation and Etherscan high verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Supply visible on Etherscan and reiterated in docs.
Notes: Upgradeable contracts introduce indirect risk despite fixed cap.
Flagged by: Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini
Source IDs: S09 · S11

Timeline of Events

Chronology with full event text and annotations.

2025-09

Private seed round announced

$200M seed round announced at $1B FDV with Perpetual PUT mechanism introduced.

Notes: Subsequent disclosures indicate large gap between committed and funded capital.

Sources: The Block · Blockhead

Source IDs: S01 · S07

2026-02-16

Public sale launch

Public token sale launched with $1B cap; FT priced at $0.10.

Notes: Tokens non-transferable until sale completion.

Sources: Incrypted · Tekedia

Source IDs: S10 · S15

2026-02-23

Token Generation Event

FT scheduled to become transferable; ftUSD and margin lending live.

Notes: Exact on-chain unlock timing not independently confirmed.

Sources: Project announcements

Source IDs: S01 · S13

Critical Red Flags

High-impact concerns surfaced by at least one model.

Absence of publicly available full smart contract audit

No named audit firm report published for production contracts despite marketing references to audits and hundreds of millions in capital at risk.

Severity: critical · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
Searches found no CertiK, Trail of Bits, Spearbit, or similar audit reports., CertiK Skynet page indicates monitoring, not completed audit.

Sources: CertiK Skynet · Flying Tulip Docs

Source IDs: S15 · S17

Cascade risk in redemption reserve via third-party protocols

Perpetual PUT reserve is deployed into Aave, Ethena, and Spark; exploits or depegs in these protocols directly impair redemption guarantees.

Severity: high · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
Reserve deployment described as relying on external DeFi protocols., Ethena funding-rate dependence noted as structural risk.

Sources: Blockhead · Tekedia

Source IDs: S07 · S10

Extreme system complexity pre-hardening

Combining spot, derivatives, lending, stablecoin, and insurance in a unified cross-margin system multiplies attack surface and systemic failure risk.

Severity: high · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
No prior DeFi protocol has successfully delivered all components at scale., Cronje history of deploying unaudited code.

Sources: DropsTab · Unchained Crypto

Source IDs: S09 · S02

Behavioral Patterns

Recurring motifs across time, claims, and operations.

Innovative but high-risk DeFi experimentation

Pattern of introducing novel financial primitives with limited precedent, coupled with aggressive timelines and marketing.

Frequency: Repeated across Cronje-led projects

Project History

Portfolio-level outcomes and operational trajectory.

Flying Tulip

2025-09 to ongoing

Andre Cronje–led DeFi protocol proposing a unified on-chain exchange with principal-protected financing.

Outcome: Ongoing; TGE scheduled week of Feb 23, 2026

Sources: Media reports, project docs

Source IDs: S01 · S08 · S13

Contradictions & Disputes

Where narratives conflict and what is unresolved.

Claim A

Flying Tulip raised $200M in seed funding.

Source: Press and syndicated media reports

Claim B

Only a fraction of the $200M seed was ultimately funded and held due to refunds and exits.

Source: Project sale update disclosures

Resolution: Headline figure reflects commitments, not fully retained capital. · Confidence: high

Claim A

Overall project risk score assessed at 62.

Source: One LLM assessment

Claim B

Overall project risk score assessed at 78.

Source: Another LLM assessment

Resolution: Median score of 70 used per instructions. · Confidence: high

Key Insights

Synthesis highlights from all available model outputs.

Perpetual PUT materially reduces classic rug-pull risk

Capital is not spent upfront; redemption option constrains outright theft scenarios for primary buyers.

Importance: high

Financial risk remains high despite protections

High FDV, incomplete product, and dependency on external yield sources expose participants to significant downside beyond narrative guarantees.

Importance: critical

Evidence Gaps

What remains unknown and what needs corroboration.

Existence and scope of completed third-party audits for all critical contracts

Why uncertain: No audit reports publicly linked or retrievable.

What was searched: Project docs, CertiK Skynet, general web search

Post-TGE holder distribution and real liquidity depth

Why uncertain: Token non-transferable at report date.

What was searched: Etherscan, DropsTab

Confidence Notes

Data-quality and uncertainty indicators from the distillation step.

Data Completeness
Moderate; extensive documentation but limited independent verification
Source Verification
High for major media; medium for self-published sources
Identity Confidence
High
Timeline Confidence
Medium-high
Conflicting Findings
Primarily around funding totals, audit status, and risk scoring
Limitations
Pre-TGE status limits on-chain and market validation

Source References

Collected references/links from all source-like fields in the distilled payload.

Data Preservation Annex

Raw distilled payload is attached to avoid information loss or truncation.

Third Party Reputation Scores
[]
Full JSON payload
{
  "subject_name": "Flying Tulip ($FT)",
  "type": "project",
  "overall_score": 70,
  "research_sources": "Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini",
  "research_date": "2026-02-22",
  "source_registry": [
    {
      "source_id": "S01",
      "url": "https://www.theblock.co/post/372787/andre-cronje-flying-tulip-funding-crypto-token-valuation",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip raises $200 million at $1 billion token valuation",
      "publisher": "The Block",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S02",
      "url": "https://unchainedcrypto.com/andre-cronjes-new-crypto-project-raises-200-million-at-1-billion-valuation/",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's New Crypto Project Raises $200 Million at $1 Billion Valuation",
      "publisher": "Unchained Crypto",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S03",
      "url": "https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/andre-cronje-s-flying-tulip-raises-usd200-million-ahead-of-ico",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip Raises $200 Million Ahead of ICO",
      "publisher": "The Defiant",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S04",
      "url": "https://www.coinspeaker.com/andre-cronjes-flying-tulip-completes-200m-round-reveals-tokenomics-for-public-phase/",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip Completes $200M Round, Reveals Tokenomics for Public Phase",
      "publisher": "Coinspeaker",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S05",
      "url": "https://iq.wiki/wiki/flying-tulip",
      "title": "Flying Tulip - Decentralized Finance",
      "publisher": "IQ.wiki",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S06",
      "url": "https://blog.coinlist.co/announcing-the-flying-tulip-sale-on-coinlist/",
      "title": "Announcing the Flying Tulip Sale on CoinList",
      "publisher": "CoinList Blog",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S07",
      "url": "https://www.blockhead.co/2025/09/30/andre-cronjes-flying-tulip-raises-200m-with-perpetual-put-protection-for-investors/",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip Raises $200M with Perpetual Put Protection for Investors",
      "publisher": "Blockhead",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S08",
      "url": "https://www.nftgators.com/andre-cronjes-flying-tulip-secures-25-5m-series-a-from-public-token-sale/",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip Secures $25.5M Series A from Public Token Sale",
      "publisher": "NFTgators",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S09",
      "url": "https://dropstab.com/coins/flying-tulip",
      "title": "Flying Tulip FT Project Profile & Token Activities",
      "publisher": "DropsTab",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S10",
      "url": "https://www.tekedia.com/flying-tulips-intent-and-supporter-participation-goes-live/",
      "title": "Flying Tulip's Intent and Supporter Participation Goes Live",
      "publisher": "Tekedia",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S11",
      "url": "https://etherscan.io/token/0x5DD1A7A369e8273371d2DBf9d83356057088082c",
      "title": "Flying Tulip (FT) ERC-20 Token Tracker — Etherscan",
      "publisher": "Etherscan",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S12",
      "url": "https://docs.flyingtulip.com/guides/sale-process/",
      "title": "Public Sale | Flying Tulip Docs",
      "publisher": "Flying Tulip",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S13",
      "url": "https://blog.flyingtulip.com/",
      "title": "Flying Tulip Blog",
      "publisher": "Flying Tulip",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S14",
      "url": "https://en.coin-turk.com/andre-cronje-launches-flying-tulip-to-offer-safe-harbor-in-defi-volatility/",
      "title": "Andre Cronje Launches Flying Tulip to Offer Safe Harbor in DeFi Volatility",
      "publisher": "CoinTurk",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S15",
      "url": "https://incrypted.com/en/flying-tulip-announces-1-billion-capped-token-sale-set-to-launch-on-february-16/",
      "title": "Flying Tulip to Hold $1 Billion-Capped Token Sale Starting February 16",
      "publisher": "Incrypted",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S16",
      "url": "https://www.financialcontent.com/article/marketminute-2025-9-30-andre-cronjes-flying-tulip-a-billion-dollar-crypto-project-with-lingering-skepticism",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip: A Billion-Dollar Crypto Project with Lingering Skepticism",
      "publisher": "FinancialContent / MarketMinute",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S17",
      "url": "https://skynet.certik.com/projects/flying-tulip",
      "title": "Flying Tulip - CertiK Skynet Project Insight",
      "publisher": "CertiK Skynet",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S18",
      "url": "https://icodrops.com/flying-tulip/",
      "title": "Flying Tulip (FT) — ICO Drops",
      "publisher": "ICO Drops",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S19",
      "url": "https://www.kucoin.com/news/articles/andre-cronje-project-flying-tulip-ft-lands-on-coinlist-a-new-era-for-defi-investor-protection",
      "title": "Andre Cronje's Flying Tulip on CoinList",
      "publisher": "KuCoin",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S20",
      "url": "https://sonicscan.org/address/0x65DeC23aC61c6BEcbC0C56E1067B71A91993D8Ac",
      "title": "Flying Tulip FTQ Token — SonicScan",
      "publisher": "SonicScan",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-22"
    }
  ],
  "third_party_reputation_scores": [],
  "identity": {
    "verified_name": "Flying Tulip",
    "handles": [
      "@flyingtulip_",
      "$FT"
    ],
    "email_addresses": [],
    "locations": [
      "Global (US, Europe, Asia team presence claimed)"
    ],
    "verification_status": "high",
    "source_ids": [
      "S01",
      "S05",
      "S13"
    ]
  },
  "credentials_and_claims": [
    {
      "claim": "Flying Tulip is a full-stack on-chain exchange unifying spot trading, perpetuals, options, lending, a delta-neutral stablecoin (ftUSD), and on-chain insurance into a single cross-margin system.",
      "source": "Project documentation and media interviews",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Only ftUSD and margin lending launched as of report date; other components described as forthcoming.",
      "verification_status": "partially verified",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "notes": "Product scope is aspirational; execution incomplete.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S03",
        "S05",
        "S13"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Primary-sale participants receive a Perpetual PUT redemption right allowing them to burn FT to reclaim original principal from an on-chain reserve.",
      "source": "Flying Tulip sale documentation",
      "verified": true,
      "verification_evidence": "Mechanism described in docs; ftPUT ERC-721 referenced; reserve deployment described.",
      "verification_status": "verified",
      "confidence": "high",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "notes": "Protection is conditional and capped by reserve availability.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S06",
        "S07",
        "S12"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Total token supply is fixed at 10,000,000,000 FT with zero inflation.",
      "source": "Token documentation and Etherscan",
      "verified": true,
      "verification_evidence": "Supply visible on Etherscan and reiterated in docs.",
      "verification_status": "verified",
      "confidence": "high",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "notes": "Upgradeable contracts introduce indirect risk despite fixed cap.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S09",
        "S11"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "project_history": [
    {
      "name": "Flying Tulip",
      "period": "2025-09 to ongoing",
      "description": "Andre Cronje–led DeFi protocol proposing a unified on-chain exchange with principal-protected financing.",
      "funding": "~$275,500,000+ confirmed; up to $1B cap",
      "outcome": "Ongoing; TGE scheduled week of Feb 23, 2026",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "$126M self-reported pre-TGE TVL; yield ~$85,000",
      "team_members": [
        "Andre Cronje"
      ],
      "controversies": [
        "No published full smart contract audit pre-TGE",
        "Complex system design with elevated attack surface",
        "Marketing narratives perceived as overstating protection"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "Media reports, project docs"
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S08",
        "S13"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "timeline": [
    {
      "date": "2025-09",
      "title": "Private seed round announced",
      "description": "$200M seed round announced at $1B FDV with Perpetual PUT mechanism introduced.",
      "sources": [
        "The Block",
        "Blockhead"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "Subsequent disclosures indicate large gap between committed and funded capital.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S07"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-02-16",
      "title": "Public sale launch",
      "description": "Public token sale launched with $1B cap; FT priced at $0.10.",
      "sources": [
        "Incrypted",
        "Tekedia"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "Tokens non-transferable until sale completion.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S10",
        "S15"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-02-23",
      "title": "Token Generation Event",
      "description": "FT scheduled to become transferable; ftUSD and margin lending live.",
      "sources": [
        "Project announcements"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "Exact on-chain unlock timing not independently confirmed.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S13"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "red_flags": [
    {
      "title": "Absence of publicly available full smart contract audit",
      "description": "No named audit firm report published for production contracts despite marketing references to audits and hundreds of millions in capital at risk.",
      "severity": "critical",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Searches found no CertiK, Trail of Bits, Spearbit, or similar audit reports.",
        "CertiK Skynet page indicates monitoring, not completed audit."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "Live Sherlock bug bounty program"
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "CertiK Skynet",
        "Flying Tulip Docs"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S15",
        "S17"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Cascade risk in redemption reserve via third-party protocols",
      "description": "Perpetual PUT reserve is deployed into Aave, Ethena, and Spark; exploits or depegs in these protocols directly impair redemption guarantees.",
      "severity": "high",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Reserve deployment described as relying on external DeFi protocols.",
        "Ethena funding-rate dependence noted as structural risk."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "Use of established protocols; rate-limited redemptions"
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Grok"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "Blockhead",
        "Tekedia"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S07",
        "S10"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Extreme system complexity pre-hardening",
      "description": "Combining spot, derivatives, lending, stablecoin, and insurance in a unified cross-margin system multiplies attack surface and systemic failure risk.",
      "severity": "high",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "No prior DeFi protocol has successfully delivered all components at scale.",
        "Cronje history of deploying unaudited code."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "Sonic-first phased rollout"
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "DropsTab",
        "Unchained Crypto"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S09",
        "S02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "behavioral_patterns": [
    {
      "title": "Innovative but high-risk DeFi experimentation",
      "description": "Pattern of introducing novel financial primitives with limited precedent, coupled with aggressive timelines and marketing.",
      "examples": [
        "Deriswap concept",
        "Perpetual PUT framing"
      ],
      "frequency": "Repeated across Cronje-led projects",
      "confidence": "high",
      "sources": [
        "Historical Cronje projects",
        "Media analysis"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S02",
        "S16"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "contradictions_and_disputes": [
    {
      "claim_1": "Flying Tulip raised $200M in seed funding.",
      "claim_2": "Only a fraction of the $200M seed was ultimately funded and held due to refunds and exits.",
      "source_1": "Press and syndicated media reports",
      "source_2": "Project sale update disclosures",
      "resolution": "Headline figure reflects commitments, not fully retained capital.",
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S13"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim_1": "Overall project risk score assessed at 62.",
      "claim_2": "Overall project risk score assessed at 78.",
      "source_1": "One LLM assessment",
      "source_2": "Another LLM assessment",
      "resolution": "Median score of 70 used per instructions.",
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": []
    }
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    {
      "question": "Existence and scope of completed third-party audits for all critical contracts",
      "why_uncertain": "No audit reports publicly linked or retrievable.",
      "searched": "Project docs, CertiK Skynet, general web search",
      "source_ids": [
        "S15",
        "S17"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "Post-TGE holder distribution and real liquidity depth",
      "why_uncertain": "Token non-transferable at report date.",
      "searched": "Etherscan, DropsTab",
      "source_ids": [
        "S09",
        "S11"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "key_insights": [
    {
      "title": "Perpetual PUT materially reduces classic rug-pull risk",
      "description": "Capital is not spent upfront; redemption option constrains outright theft scenarios for primary buyers.",
      "importance": "high",
      "evidence": [
        "On-chain reserve design",
        "Burn-to-redeem mechanism"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S07"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Financial risk remains high despite protections",
      "description": "High FDV, incomplete product, and dependency on external yield sources expose participants to significant downside beyond narrative guarantees.",
      "importance": "critical",
      "evidence": [
        "$1B FDV at TGE",
        "Reserve deployment risks"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S01",
        "S10"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "risk_assessment": {
    "overall_score": 70,
    "score_reasoning": "Median of divergent LLM assessments reflecting high execution, smart contract, and financial risk offset by novel investor protections and credible founder track record.",
    "criminal_risk": "none found",
    "financial_risk": "high",
    "reputational_risk": "medium-high",
    "verification_risk": "medium",
    "source_ids": [
      "S01",
      "S02",
      "S07",
      "S09"
    ]
  },
  "confidence_notes": {
    "data_completeness": "Moderate; extensive documentation but limited independent verification",
    "source_verification": "High for major media; medium for self-published sources",
    "identity_confidence": "High",
    "timeline_confidence": "Medium-high",
    "conflicting_findings": "Primarily around funding totals, audit status, and risk scoring",
    "limitations": "Pre-TGE status limits on-chain and market validation"
  }
}