Rami Al-Hashimi

Person HIGH RISK

Consolidated score is the median of the LLM-reported overall scores present in the provided artifacts (68 and 72), yielding 70. Risk drivers explicitly highlighted across outputs include: repeated engagement-gated wallet-address solicitations and giveaway-style promotions with no independently auditable evidence of fulfillment; unverified, extreme trading performance claims; a high-profile catastrophic loss narrative that (if accurate) contradicts implied trading expertise; misinformation propagation risk via sensationalist claims; and potential involvement in suspect token promotion ecosystems (YZY) per third-party reporting. Ethos credibility score and review/vouch/slash data are missing due to access constraints, increasing verification risk; therefore, the score reflects elevated uncertainty rather than an Ethos-anchored adjustment.

Generated: 21/02/2026, 22:06:36
Research date: 2026-02-21
Sources: Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini
Slug: rami-al-hashimi
Overall Risk Score
70/100
Higher score indicates higher observed risk in this dossier.
Claims: 12
Timeline: 18
Red flags: 9
Evidence gaps: 7

Identity & Background

Known attributes linked to the subject profile.

Field Value
Verified Name Rami Al-Hashimi
Handles
  • @rami_hashimi (primary, joined 2013-08-04), variants like @RAMMI_HASHIMI_
  • {"platform":"X","handle":"rami_hashimi","url":"[https://x.com/rami_hashimi?lang=en](https://x.com/rami_hashimi?lang=en)","notes":"High-confidence linkage to the persona referenced in this dossier."}
  • @rami_alhashimi
Email Addresses N/A
Locations
  • UAE (profile flag 🇦🇪)
  • India (per X account signals, unconfirmed by posts or other sources)
  • {"location":"Unverified; X UI displays profile metadata (not reliably extractable without authenticated access in this environment).","confidence":"low"}
Verification Status low
Source Ids CLAUDE-SRC-001 · GPT-SRC-001 · GPT-SRC-002 · GROK-SRC-001
Disambiguation Notes
  • {"description":"Distinct individual with same name is a Saudi engineering consultant with no crypto ties.","source_ids":[]}
  • {"description":"A separate person named Rami Al-Hashimi exists: Founder & Designer of RAKA Design (architectural firm), previously General Manager at Innovators Consulting Engineers, Saudi Arabia. Holds Bachelor of Architectural Engineering from King Abdulaziz University (1991-1996). Also has handle @rami_alhashimi on X (Jeddah, inactive).","source_ids":["GROK-SRC-006","GROK-SRC-007","GROK-SRC-008"],"verdict":"DIFFERENT PERSON – the architect and the @rami_hashimi crypto account are distinct individuals. The architect's LinkedIn/ZoomInfo record is the only professionally documented Rami Al-Hashimi found."}
  • {"description":"The DOJ case involves a different person (Mohammad David Hashimi).","source_ids":[],"verdict":"NO CONNECTION – different first name, different context."}
Geo Flag Discrepancy
{
  "profile_display": "🇦🇪 UAE flag emoji used in display name and profile",
  "x_reported_location": "India (per disambiguation hint provided by requester)",
  "assessment": "High-confidence red flag: account self-presents as UAE-affiliated but X's geo-location signals India. This discrepancy is a classic pattern in accounts that manufacture a Gulf/MENA premium credibility for crypto audiences while operating out of a lower-cost location.",
  "source_ids": [
    "GROK-SRC-001"
  ]
}

Risk Assessment

Model-level score reasoning and risk dimensions.

Overall Score
70
Score Reasoning
Consolidated score is the median of the LLM-reported overall scores present in the provided artifacts (68 and 72), yielding 70. Risk drivers explicitly highlighted across outputs include: repeated engagement-gated wallet-address solicitations and giveaway-style promotions with no independently auditable evidence of fulfillment; unverified, extreme trading performance claims; a high-profile catastrophic loss narrative that (if accurate) contradicts implied trading expertise; misinformation propagation risk via sensationalist claims; and potential involvement in suspect token promotion ecosystems (YZY) per third-party reporting. Ethos credibility score and review/vouch/slash data are missing due to access constraints, increasing verification risk; therefore, the score reflects elevated uncertainty rather than an Ethos-anchored adjustment.
Criminal Risk
low/none found
Financial Risk
high
Reputational Risk
high
Verification Risk
high (identity and on-chain ownership not verified; Ethos data unavailable; many high-impact claims are self-reports or derivative write-ups)
Llm Reported Scores
{"model":"Claude","overall_score":68,"source":"risk_assessment.overall_score field in Claude-provided JSON"}, {"model":"GPT","overall_score":72,"source":"risk_assessment.overall_score field in GPT-provided JSON"}, {"model":"Grok","overall_score":null,"source":"No numeric overall_score reported in the provided Grok artifact"}, {"model":"Gemini","overall_score":null,"source":"No numeric overall_score reported in the provided Gemini artifact"}

Claim Ledger

Complete claims table with expandable corroboration notes.

Claim Source Confidence Status
Expert crypto trader capable of dominating the market and calling 100x memecoins Self-proclaimed via bio and posts low unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Self-proclaimed via bio and posts; no independent verification of consistent profitable track record or professional trading credentials. Publicized 99.79% portfolio wipeout contradicts expertise claims.
Notes: Claim framed as an implied expertise signal via profile/bio and posting style. Contradicted by (a) a catastrophic loss narrative and (b) multiple unverified extreme PnL claims without primary account records.
Flagged by: Claude
Made $1 million from $Lobstar memecoin purchase ($5k to $1M) X post by @rami_hashimi low disputed
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Posted with screenshot/video; community replies flag wallet as 'view only' on chain explorers suggesting possible fabricated proof. No on-chain confirmation of ownership or realization of gains.
Notes: Dispute is based on community replies/analyst interpretation of the posted wallet view. No attributable wallet proof is provided in the captured evidence.
Flagged by: Claude
Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-005
Technical/developer background or project involvement Implied/assumed by persona; searched externally low unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: No GitHub, LinkedIn, education records, or code contributions found linking to crypto development. Distinct individual with same name is a Saudi engineering consultant with no crypto ties.
Notes: This is primarily an absence-of-evidence finding (evidence gap).
Flagged by: Claude, Grok, Gemini
Source IDs: GROK-SRC-006 · GROK-SRC-007
Born in 1980; age stated as 44 at the time of posting. X post by @rami_hashimi medium unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: This is a self-assertion on X. No independent corroboration located in accessible public registries or professional profiles within the research constraints.
Notes: Treated as self-report only.
Flagged by: GPT
Source IDs: GPT-SRC-003
Achieved a trading profit of approximately $4,0,000 by longing "$PUMP" at a bottom. X post by @rami_hashimi low unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Self-reported trading result; no verifiable brokerage statements, on-chain proof, or independently auditable account data provided in the source.
Notes: No primary account evidence available in the research artifacts.
Flagged by: GPT
Source IDs: GPT-SRC-004
Suffered a loss event described as turning $4,0,000 into $0 and stated an intention to leave. X post by @rami_hashimi; amplified by Binance Square write-ups low unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: The post exists, but the underlying financial event is not independently verifiable from the post alone. Secondary write-ups on Binance Square exist but appear to rest on the same social media narrative rather than primary account records.
Notes: Multiple downstream posts appear derivative rather than providing primary evidence (exchange statement screenshots were referenced in some summaries but not independently validated within the artifact).
Flagged by: GPT
Operates as a crypto trading and airdrop-oriented influencer, including repeated requests for wallet addresses and giveaway-style promotions. Multiple X posts soliciting addresses high verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Multiple primary posts solicit wallet addresses for purported airdrops or giveaways.
Notes: The fact of solicitation is verified; fulfillment of promised distributions is not verified.
Flagged by: GPT, Claude, Grok
Warns about non-paying "reply with your SOL address" airdrop posts. X post by @rami_hashimi high verified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: The post explicitly criticizes the pattern of address-collection airdrop posts that do not send tokens.
Notes: This creates an internal contradiction risk when paired with the subject's own address-solicitation posts, absent payout evidence.
Flagged by: GPT
Source IDs: GPT-SRC-012
Amplified rumor example (third-party site quoting the subject): a sponsored market update article quotes an X post attributed to the subject asserting that a public figure bought Zcash. InsideBitcoins sponsored article medium unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: The article does not evidence the claim independently, and the source appears to be the X post itself.
Notes: This is presented as an example of misinformation propagation risk rather than an independently verified falsehood.
Flagged by: GPT
Source IDs: GPT-SRC-015
Coordinated-style promo of YZY token with similar giveaway patterns across accounts; accusations of fake giveaways/proofs CCN analysis article and inferred patterning medium unverified
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Identified by a third-party article as part of a set of accounts posting similar engagement-farming content around YZY token; the dossier does not include primary proof of coordination beyond the third-party characterization.
Notes: Downstream risk characterization depends materially on the CCN article framing.
Flagged by: Claude, Gemini
X/Twitter reportedly geolocates server activity to India. Narrative research output (not backed by a specific, accessible primary source in the provided artifacts) low disputed
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Explicitly described as a research hint and not independently confirmed by captured sources. Multiple outputs treat it as a suspicious discrepancy but also note access/metadata limitations.
Notes: This is treated as a red-flag hypothesis rather than a confirmed fact within the provided evidence. Included because it was asserted in the research outputs.
Flagged by: Grok, Gemini, Claude
Follower count shown on X UI: ~137,600 as of research date; also described as ~162k+ followers in another output. X UI observation (not stable, subject to change) and narrative summaries low disputed
Expanded evidence
Verification evidence: Conflicting reported follower counts across outputs; no single frozen snapshot provided in the artifacts that reconciles the exact number.
Notes: The precise number is treated as unstable metadata; the overall pattern of a large following is consistent across outputs.
Flagged by: Claude, Grok

Timeline of Events

Chronology with full event text and annotations.

2013-08

X account creation

@rami_hashimi account registered with current bio 'Follow Me to dominate the Crypto'.

Notes: One output also states the join date is shown in the X UI as August 2013; another states joined 2013-08-04. Both treated as platform metadata, not identity proof.

Sources: X

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001 · GPT-SRC-002 · GROK-SRC-001

2024-08

Airdrop and wallet-address solicitation activity observed

Posts include calls to drop Solana and Ethereum addresses for purported distributions and challenges.

Notes: The solicitation behavior is directly observable in the referenced posts; payout fulfillment remains unverified.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-008 · GPT-SRC-010 · GPT-SRC-019

2024-11-23

DOGE giveaway post

Posts DOGE giveaway: 'Finally reached $0.46! ...send 1,0,000 $DOGE (~$46,000) to one person by tomorrow. Just like, retweet and comment done.' Gets 826K views, 8K retweets.

Notes: The engagement metrics and the quoted claim are from the narrative research output; the specific post URL is not provided in the artifacts beyond referencing the X profile surface. Included as stated.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GROK-SRC-001

2024-12-17

PENGU airdrop/giveaway post

Posts PENGU airdrop giveaway: 'Finally Claimed my $3,0,000 $PENGU Airdrop! ...send 500,000 $PENGU (~$25,000) to one person by tomorrow.'

Notes: The claim is reported in the narrative research output; no direct URL provided in the artifacts beyond referencing the X profile surface. Included as stated.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GROK-SRC-001

2025-05

Self-asserted age and birth year

A post states the author was born in 1980 and is 44 at the time of posting.

Notes: Self-report only.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-003

2025-06

Major portfolio liquidation (version 1)

Lost $3.736M (-99.79% of portfolio) in single leveraged trade on Binance; publicly stated 'Three years of work... all destroyed. I will never return.'

Notes: One output states the liquidation occurred in June 2025. Another output treats the event date as unclear and flags that the Binance Square narrative may be derivative. A separate Gemini output specifies the date as 2025-06-13 and adds instrument details.

Sources: Binance Square

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-003 · GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1 · GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2

2025-06-13

Catastrophic Liquidation (instrument detail version)

Lost $3,736,996.21 (-99.79% of his portfolio) in a matter of seconds. The loss was due to an over-leveraged long/short position on RESOLVUSDT perpetual futures on Binance. He publicly posted his final PNL, stating: 'Three years of work... all destroyed. I will never return.'

Notes: This is presented with high confidence in one output; other outputs explicitly state that primary account statements were not retrieved and that secondary write-ups appear derivative. Included as stated.

Sources: Binance Square

Source IDs: GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1 · GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2

2025-09

Self-asserted $4,0,000 trading gain

A post claims a large gain from a leveraged position on "$PUMP".

Notes: Unverified self-report.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-004

2025-10

Self-asserted catastrophic loss and exit statement (version 2)

A post claims turning $4,0,000 into $0 and states being done. Binance Square posts amplify a narrative of a roughly $3.7 million liquidation but do not provide primary account statements.

Notes: This conflicts with another timeline that places the liquidation in June 2025. Included as stated.

Sources: X · Binance Square

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-005 · GPT-SRC-006 · GPT-SRC-007

2025-10-10

Tweet cited in Naked Capitalism article

Tweet cited in Naked Capitalism article on crypto market crash and auto-deleveraging; tweet used as illustrative color, not as expert commentary. Indicates account was posting actively during October 2025 market event.

Notes: The specific embedded tweet content is not reproduced in the provided artifact beyond this description. Included as stated.

Sources: Naked Capitalism

Source IDs: GROK-SRC-005

2025-10-21

Barron Trump Lamborghini engagement-bait post

Posts engagement-bait questioning whether Barron Trump is 'the biggest scammer of crypto' referencing a Lamborghini.

Notes: Included as stated; the post URL exists in the Grok source registry.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GROK-SRC-004

2025-10

Fake/ misleading gold deposit post

Posted 'BREAKING: Gold prices plunging after largest gold deposit discovered in Africa (10% global supply boost)'. Widely called out as fabricated FUD or engagement bait in crypto communities.

Notes: The community backlash is described in the research output; primary post URL is included.

Sources: X

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-004

2025-10-22

BTC giveaway post

Posts BTC giveaway: 'If I send you 1 $BTC worth $113,0, will it change your life? First 1000 to interact.' Gets 186.8K views.

Notes: Engagement metrics are from the narrative research output; included as stated.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GROK-SRC-003

2025-11

First documented 'I quit crypto' post

Posted 'CRYPTO IS A SCAM... I QUIT AND I'M NOT COMING BACK THIS TIME' amid market conditions.

Notes: No direct URL provided for this specific post in the artifacts; included as described.

Sources: X

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001

2025-11-13

InsideBitcoins sponsored market update quoting attributed post

A sponsored market update article quotes an X post attributed to the subject asserting that a public figure bought Zcash. The article does not evidence the claim independently, and the source appears to be the X post itself.

Notes: Included as an example of misinformation propagation risk.

Sources: InsideBitcoins

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-015

2026-01

Second 'I quit crypto' post

Repeated near-identical rage-quit message despite continued activity.

Notes: No direct URL provided for this specific post in the artifacts; included as described.

Sources: X

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001

2026-01

BlackRock dumping claim (debunked framing)

In January 2026, he posted 'BREAKING: BLACKROCK IS DUMPING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS,' which analysts immediately debunked as standard ETF redemptions.

Notes: The claim is presented in an output as an example of misinformation; the underlying X post URL is not included in the artifacts. Included as stated.

Sources: The Deep Dive

Source IDs: GEMINI-src_deepdive

2026-02

Ongoing activity

Active daily posting: giveaway farming (SOL sends, debt payoff, birthday $5k $ETG airdrops), 'next 100x DM me', bullish market calls, Trump/BTC hype. High engagement but replies full of scam accusations and skepticism.

Notes: Specific examples and exact posts are not fully enumerated in the artifacts, beyond the referenced giveaway/airdrop posts and the Lobstar claim post.

Sources: X

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001 · CLAUDE-SRC-005

Critical Red Flags

High-impact concerns surfaced by at least one model.

Classic engagement-farming playbook with unverifiable giveaways

Frequent posts promising SOL/ETH sends, debt payoffs, or random airdrops to likers/retweeters/commenters. No public on-chain proof of fulfillment at scale; community accuses fakes. Standard tactic to inflate metrics and appear generous while harvesting data/engagement.

Severity: high · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
Multiple posts promising $12k SOL, $5k ETH, 'pay your debt' wallet drops, 'first 444 interact', Multiple primary posts solicit addresses and promise distributions., Some posts encourage interactions (like, repost, comment) as a condition., Repeatedly posts large-denomination giveaway announcements (1M DOGE, 500K PENGU, 1 BTC) with 'like, retweet, comment done' mechanics and a countdown timer. These are canonical giveaway scam patterns. No evidence any giveaway was ever executed.

Sources: X posts and profile surface · Narrative research output describing giveaway mechanics and engagement metrics

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001 · CLAUDE-SRC-005 · GPT-SRC-008 · GPT-SRC-009 · GPT-SRC-010 · GPT-SRC-011 · GPT-SRC-013 · GPT-SRC-019 · GROK-SRC-001 · GROK-SRC-003

Unverifiable profit claims and possible fake trading proofs

$1M Lobstar claim uses screenshot flagged as 'view only wallet' by analysts. Pattern of hyping wins after documented massive loss without audited track record.

Severity: high · Confidence: medium
Supporting evidence
Lobstar post analysis; community replies on chain tools, Self-reported $4,0,000 gain claim., Self-reported $4,0,000 to $0 loss claim.

Sources: X · Binance Square (derivative amplification alleged)

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-005 · GPT-SRC-004 · GPT-SRC-005

Narrative shifts and repeated rage-quits

Posts declaring crypto a scam and permanent exit (2025-11, 2026-01) followed immediately by return to heavy shilling and hype. Indicates emotional/inconsistent behavior or manipulation for sympathy/attention.

Severity: medium · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
Multiple identical quit posts while account remains highly active, Despite dramatically quitting the crypto space forever following his $3.7M liquidation in June 2025, he returned almost immediately to promote highly risky meme coins and coordinate engagement farms.

Sources: X · Binance Square · CCN

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001 · GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1 · GEMINI-src_ccn

Potential coordinated misleading promotion (YZY token)

One of several large accounts posting identical-style profit/giveaway claims around Kanye YZY token launch amid rug/insider concerns.

Severity: medium · Confidence: medium
Supporting evidence
CCN report listing @rami_hashimi among similar accounts, Identified by crypto analysts as a participant in a suspected rug pull ring for the YZY Token, leveraging his following to trap retail liquidity.

Sources: CCN

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-006 · GEMINI-src_ccn

Spreading unverified market-moving claims

Africa gold deposit 'breaking news' post called fake/desparate by multiple communities; fits pattern of FUD/hype for engagement or positioning.

Severity: medium · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
Post content and community backlash

Sources: X

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-004

Misinformation propagation risk (example: celebrity purchase assertion)

A third-party article reproduces an assertion attributed to the subject about a celebrity buying a specific cryptoasset. The article provides no independent documentation of the purchase and appears to rely on the social post itself, increasing misinformation risk.

Severity: medium · Confidence: medium
Supporting evidence
Sponsored market update article quoting the subject's post without independent corroboration.

Sources: InsideBitcoins

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-015

Internal contradiction risk: criticizes non-paying airdrop posts while using similar mechanics

The subject posts criticism of address-collection airdrop posts that do not pay, yet also publishes multiple posts that request addresses for promised distributions. Without independent proof of payouts, this creates an unresolved credibility conflict.

Severity: medium · Confidence: high
Supporting evidence
Critical post about non-paying address-collection airdrops., Multiple posts requesting addresses for purported payouts.

Sources: X

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-012 · GPT-SRC-008 · GPT-SRC-009 · GPT-SRC-010 · GPT-SRC-011

Identity/Location Obfuscation

Mismatch between the outward Middle Eastern branding (UAE flag, Arabic text) and internal platform signals pointing to India. Signals indicate the account is a facade for a commercial engagement farming operation rather than a genuine individual.

Severity: high · Confidence: low
Supporting evidence
Uses a United Arab Emirates flag (🇦🇪) and an Arabic name., X backend reportedly links the account origin/location to India (as noted in research hints)., Conclusion framed as "High likelihood of geographic spoofing or a purchased account used for engagement farming."

Sources: Narrative output statements; no dedicated primary URL provided for the India linkage

Source IDs: GROK-SRC-001

False Statements & Fake News

Repeatedly posts easily debunked misinformation to trigger viral algorithms. For example, in October 2025, he falsely claimed Barron Trump dumped $WLFI to buy a '$500M yacht' while shorting the market with 10x leverage. In January 2026, he posted 'BREAKING: BLACKROCK IS DUMPING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS,' which analysts immediately debunked as standard ETF redemptions.

Severity: critical · Confidence: low
Supporting evidence
99Bitcoins referenced as supporting evidence for the Barron Trump allegation example., The Deep Dive referenced as supporting evidence for the BlackRock transfers/redemptions framing.

Sources: 99Bitcoins · The Deep Dive

Source IDs: GEMINI-src_99bitcoins · GEMINI-src_deepdive

Behavioral Patterns

Recurring motifs across time, claims, and operations.

High-volume engagement bait under pressure or market dips

When market is down or after personal loss, shifts to massive giveaway promises and 'changing lives' framing. Under criticism, ignores or deletes rather than address (e.g., 'this tweet will be deleted in 16hrs').

Frequency: Recurring; described as frequent/high-volume across sampled posts

Overpromising alpha while delivering typical CT noise

Claims insider 100x knowledge but directs to DM (paywall-like); public analysis often generic bullish ('retail coming', 'bullish than you imagine').

Frequency: Recurring

Engagement-gated financial promises

Promises of airdrops or monetary rewards are frequently conditioned on social engagement actions (like, repost, comment) and providing wallet addresses.

Frequency: High-frequency across sampled posts

Narrative volatility in trading outcomes

The public persona includes dramatic claims of extreme wins followed by extreme losses and exit statements. This can be a hallmark of high-risk trading behavior, attention capture, or both. Verification is limited by lack of primary account evidence.

Frequency: Observed at least twice in sampled claims (profit claim; loss claim) plus third-party amplification

Project History

Portfolio-level outcomes and operational trajectory.

None identified as founder/developer

N/A

No evidence of founding, launching, or developing any crypto projects, tokens, DAOs, or startups. Operates solely as social media influencer and memecoin trader/shiller.

Outcome: N/A - no projects to evaluate

Sources: X profile/posts review (as described in research outputs)

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001

Crypto Twitter Influencer / Memecoin Shiller

2013-present

Builds audience via hype posts, "next 100x" teases (DM for access), engagement farming giveaways, and market commentary. Public examples include calls on $penguin, $clawd, $PUNCH analysis, AI/meta tokens.

Outcome: Audience growth to 162k+ followers; no verifiable sustained alpha or fund delivery; multiple "I quit crypto" rage posts followed by return.

Sources: X · CCN

Source IDs: CLAUDE-SRC-001 · CLAUDE-SRC-006

Airdrop and giveaway promotions (multi-token, multi-chain)

2024-2026 (observed in sampled posts; full back-catalog not exhaustively enumerated)

A recurring pattern of posts promising token distributions or cash-equivalent rewards to respondents who like, repost, and share wallet addresses, including Solana and Ethereum addresses.

Outcome: Unverified fulfillment. The public record available here shows solicitation and promises, but not independently auditable proof of distributions at scale.

Sources: X posts

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-008 · GPT-SRC-009 · GPT-SRC-010 · GPT-SRC-011 · GPT-SRC-012 · GPT-SRC-013 · GPT-SRC-019

$CR7 promotion context (contract address surfaced in search results)

Undated within this dossier (search result page observed on access date)

An X search results page includes a pairing of "$CR7" with the Ethereum address 0x2a036c8c7d10a012f71dd23a8ef6347d2e6b4444 in the query context.

Outcome: Not determinable from the search results page alone. No direct, primary post by the subject is captured in the accessible sources here confirming ownership, deployment, or financial involvement with the address.

Sources: X search results page

Source IDs: GPT-SRC-014

YZY Token (Unofficial Kanye West Token)

August 2025

Promoted massive profit claims and promised giveaways for likes/retweets. The token was heavily scrutinized amid insider trading and rug pull rumors.

Outcome: Promoted; scrutiny and rumors cited; no direct on-chain promoter attribution included beyond third-party reporting.

Sources: CCN

Source IDs: GEMINI-src_ccn · CLAUDE-SRC-006

Contradictions & Disputes

Where narratives conflict and what is unresolved.

Claim A

Lost $3.736M (-99.79% of portfolio) in June 2025 in a single leveraged trade on Binance; publicly stated 'Three years of work... all destroyed. I will never return.'

Source: Binance Square (as cited in one output); June 2025 timeline entry

Claim B

Self-asserted catastrophic loss and exit statement placed in October 2025 (turning $4,0,000 into $0) with Binance Square amplification, but no primary account statements.

Source: X post and Binance Square write-ups; October 2025 timeline entry

Resolution: Unknown from provided artifacts. Date and specifics vary by output; multiple outputs note lack of primary account records. · Confidence: low

Claim A

Uses UAE flag emoji and Arabic name, implying UAE association.

Source: X profile presentation as described in outputs

Claim B

X/Twitter reportedly geolocates server activity to India / platform signals point to India.

Source: Research hint / narrative assertion; described as unconfirmed by posts or other sources

Resolution: Unknown from provided artifacts. Included as a flagged discrepancy, but explicitly not independently confirmed in the captured evidence. · Confidence: low

Claim A

Audience growth to 162k+ followers (Claude output).

Source: X UI observation summarized in Claude output

Claim B

~137.6K followers (narrative output) / ~137,600 as of research date (narrative output).

Source: X UI observation summarized in narrative output

Resolution: Unknown from provided artifacts. Likely reflects different sampling times or approximate readings; treated as unstable metadata. · Confidence: low

Claim A

No Ethos profile exists or is accessible for this handle.

Source: Research output statements about Ethos status

Claim B

Ethos profile URL is listed as a source, but access errors prevented retrieval of score and review data.

Source: Listed Ethos profile URLs and evidence gaps describing access constraints

Resolution: Unknown. Within provided artifacts, the Ethos score fields are null because the profile/API could not be accessed; existence versus accessibility is unresolved. · Confidence: medium

Claim A

No projects built, no code, no credentials, no audited P&L; pure social media persona with zero verifiable substance.

Source: Claude and GPT outputs (no projects identified)

Claim B

Promoter role for YZY token and coordinated networks to cross-promote unverified tokens and offer fake giveaways.

Source: Gemini output (YZY promoter role; coordinated networks)

Resolution: Not mutually exclusive. It may mean no owned/founded projects, but promotional activity for others. Remains partly unverified because promoter attribution is largely third-party reporting. · Confidence: medium

Claim A

overall_score / risk score reported as 68.

Source: Claude risk_assessment.overall_score

Claim B

overall_score / risk score reported as 72.

Source: GPT risk_assessment.overall_score

Resolution: Median of reported scores is 70, used as consolidated overall_score and risk_assessment.overall_score. · Confidence: high

Key Insights

Synthesis highlights from all available model outputs.

Pure social media persona with zero verifiable substance

No projects built, no code, no credentials, no audited P&L. Success metric is follower count and engagement farming, not delivery or transparency.

Importance: critical

Matches textbook crypto Twitter grifter archetype

Leverage gambler with publicized wipeout who returns to hype unverifiable wins, farm engagement with giveaways, tease paid signals, and flip narratives. High risk of leading followers into poor trades or emotional decisions.

Importance: high

The accessible record supports an influencer-style, engagement-gated giveaway and airdrop persona more strongly than any verifiable professional credential set

Multiple primary posts show repeated address solicitation and reward promises. By contrast, no independently verifiable education or employment history was located within accessible sources.

Importance: high

Financial performance narratives are high-impact but not independently auditable from available evidence

Claims of multi-million-dollar gains and losses exist as posts and are repeated in secondary content that appears derivative. Absent primary account records or on-chain identity proofs, these should be treated as unverified narratives.

Importance: high

Credibility tension: condemns non-paying address-collection airdrops while employing similar mechanics

The subject explicitly criticizes address-collection airdrops that do not pay, yet repeatedly requests addresses for promised distributions. Without proof of payouts, this contradiction increases reputational risk.

Importance: high

Evidence Gaps

What remains unknown and what needs corroboration.

What is the verified legal identity, passport/corporate records, and exact location/residence?

Why uncertain: Only X self-presentation; no LinkedIn, company filings, or KYC-linked data. UAE flag vs India signals conflict.

What was searched: LinkedIn, company registries, web searches for personal details

Proof of actual giveaway distributions or large wallet transactions matching claims?

Why uncertain: No public tx hashes or explorer links provided; replies demand proof but none surfaced.

What was searched: X posts, replies, on-chain mentions

Any past employment, education, or pre-crypto career?

Why uncertain: Zero mentions or records; distinct same-name professional exists but unrelated.

What was searched: LinkedIn, GitHub, education searches, web archives

Farcaster/Warpcast presence or other on-chain identity linkage?

Why uncertain: No hits in searches; Ethos API returned not found.

What was searched: Farcaster searches, Ethos API

Ethos reputation profile fields: credibility_score, vouch_count, vouch_eth_staked, reviews_positive, reviews_negative, reviews_neutral, slash_count, and top reviews

Why uncertain: The requested Ethos app and API endpoints could not be opened directly in this environment due to URL access constraints. Only Ethos API documentation and general Ethos posts were accessible.

What was searched: Ethos API documentation and internal endpoint listings; attempted direct app/API access blocked by tool safety constraints.

On-chain wallet ownership and transaction footprint (EVM and Solana addresses tied to the subject)

Why uncertain: The subject solicits addresses but does not provide verifiable, persistent wallet identifiers in the captured primary sources that can be confidently attributed as owned or controlled by the subject.

What was searched: Queries for 0x strings and contract addresses in accessible posts and search pages; only low-confidence context was found.

Education and employment verification (degrees, employers, titles, tenure)

Why uncertain: No high-confidence LinkedIn profile or employer confirmation was retrieved in accessible search results.

What was searched: Web searches for LinkedIn and professional mentions; no authoritative profile captured.

Confidence Notes

Data-quality and uncertainty indicators from the distillation step.

Data Completeness
Low-to-medium. Many claims are present, but a substantial fraction are unverified due to missing primary records, missing on-chain attribution, and inaccessible Ethos profile/API outputs.
Source Verification
Mixed. Primary X posts exist for solicitation behavior and some self-claims. Several high-impact narratives rely on third-party write-ups (Binance Square, InsideBitcoins, CCN, and others) that may be derivative or interpretive.
Identity Confidence
Low. The online persona is linked to @rami_hashimi, but legal identity, location, and cross-platform corroboration are not established. Existence of other individuals with similar names increases disambiguation risk.
Timeline Confidence
Medium for platform join date and the existence of specific referenced X posts; low for precise dating and details of liquidation events due to contradictions across outputs and lack of primary account records.
Conflicting Findings
Notable conflicts include liquidation date and evidentiary strength (June 2025 with instrument details versus October 2025 framing; verified versus unverified treatment across outputs), disputed India geolocation claims, and differing follower counts.
Limitations
Ethos reputation score and review/vouch data were not retrievable; on-chain wallet ownership was not established; full X history was not exhaustively enumerated; several claims lack direct post URLs in the artifacts; some assertions rely on narrative hints rather than captured primary evidence.

Source References

Collected references/links from all source-like fields in the distilled payload.

Data Preservation Annex

Raw distilled payload is attached to avoid information loss or truncation.

Third Party Reputation Scores
[
  {
    "platform": "ethos.network",
    "score": null,
    "score_type": "credibility",
    "reviews_positive": null,
    "reviews_negative": null,
    "reviews_neutral": null,
    "notable_review_texts": [],
    "vouch_count": null,
    "vouch_eth_staked": null,
    "slash_count": null,
    "url": "[https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi)",
    "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-002",
    "notes": "Multiple research outputs stated that the Ethos profile and/or Ethos API endpoints were not accessible in the research environment, or returned errors, so the credibility score and review/vouch/slash metrics could not be retrieved."
  }
]
Full JSON payload
{
  "subject_name": "Rami Al-Hashimi",
  "type": "person",
  "overall_score": 70,
  "research_sources": "Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini",
  "research_date": "2026-02-21",
  "source_registry": [
    {
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-001",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi](https://x.com/rami_hashimi)",
      "title": "X/Twitter Profile and Posts of @rami_hashimi",
      "publisher": "X",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-002",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-002",
      "url": "[https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi)",
      "title": "Ethos Network Reputation Profile for x/rami_hashimi",
      "publisher": "Ethos Network",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-003",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-003",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25652598562873](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25652598562873)",
      "title": "Minus $3.7 million in seconds: the tragedy of trader Rami",
      "publisher": "Binance Square",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-004",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-004",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2017303779100479967](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2017303779100479967)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi post claiming largest gold deposit in Africa",
      "publisher": "X",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-005",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-005",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2025061043152572507](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2025061043152572507)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi $1M Lobstar profit claim post",
      "publisher": "X",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-006",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-006",
      "url": "[https://www.ccn.com/analysis/crypto/kanye-west-yzy-token-rug-pull/](https://www.ccn.com/analysis/crypto/kanye-west-yzy-token-rug-pull/)",
      "title": "Kanye West's YZY Token Amid Insider Trading and Rug Pull Rumors",
      "publisher": "CCN",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-001",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-001",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi?lang=en](https://x.com/rami_hashimi?lang=en)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi رامي الهاشمي (@rami_hashimi) / Posts / X",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-002",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-002",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/with_replies](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/with_replies)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi رامي الهاشمي (@rami_hashimi) / Posts and Replies / X",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-003",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-003",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1924175567655698472](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1924175567655698472)",
      "title": "I was born in 1980. I'm 44 and don't \"feel\" old ...but might actually be the oldest person in crypto. Anyone here older ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-004",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-004",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1967794849450692688](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1967794849450692688)",
      "title": "I longed $PUMP at bottom with whatever i had and now ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-005",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-005",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1976783168905859243](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1976783168905859243)",
      "title": "turned my $4M into $0 i'm done here. thanks for playing.",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-006",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-006",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25652598562873](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25652598562873)",
      "title": "Minus $3.7 million in seconds: the tragedy of trader Rami Al Hashimi",
      "publisher": "Binance Square",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-007",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-007",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25578069478569](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25578069478569)",
      "title": "$3.7 MILLION… Gone. In. A. Flash. 😱 Rami Al-Hashimi lost",
      "publisher": "Binance Square",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-008",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-008",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1889386472849195059](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1889386472849195059)",
      "title": "$PABLO Airdrop open for 8 hours🪂 Drop your Solana $SOL ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-009",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-009",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2020210993079435591](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2020210993079435591)",
      "title": "Submit Your $SOL Wallet Address 👇 Only First 2k 🪂 ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-010",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-010",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2021511420878475277](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2021511420878475277)",
      "title": "drop your Eth address, blessing randomly ⏳",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-011",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-011",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2014866490076573823](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2014866490076573823)",
      "title": "Drop your SOL Address Thank me later First 1️⃣5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-012",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-012",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1891168690793587144/photo/1](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1891168690793587144/photo/1)",
      "title": "Are you tired of all the \"Reply with your SOL address below for an airdrop\" posts that never actually sends an airdrop?",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-013",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-013",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2024199679739633871](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/2024199679739633871)",
      "title": "I'm changing lives 🥲 I feel proud. First 444 to interact will be ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-014",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-014",
      "url": "[https://x.com/search?q=%28%24CR7+or+0x2a036c8c7d10a012f71dd23a8ef6347d2e6b4444%29](https://x.com/search?q=%28%24CR7+or+0x2a036c8c7d10a012f71dd23a8ef6347d2e6b4444%29)",
      "title": "Search results on X for ($CR7 or 0x2a036c8c7d10a012f71dd23a8ef6347d2e6b4444)",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-015",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-015",
      "url": "[https://insidebitcoins.com/sponsored/zcash-zec-price-analysis-and-market-update-november-13-2025](https://insidebitcoins.com/sponsored/zcash-zec-price-analysis-and-market-update-november-13-2025)",
      "title": "Zcash (ZEC) Price Analysis and Market Update –InsideBitcoins (Nov 13, 2025)",
      "publisher": "InsideBitcoins",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-016",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-016",
      "url": "[https://developers.ethos.network/api-documentation/api-v2/users](https://developers.ethos.network/api-documentation/api-v2/users)",
      "title": "Users | Ethos Developers - API Docs",
      "publisher": "Ethos Developers",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-017",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-017",
      "url": "[https://developers.ethos.network/api-documentation/api-v2/internal](https://developers.ethos.network/api-documentation/api-v2/internal)",
      "title": "Internal | Ethos Developers - API Docs",
      "publisher": "Ethos Developers",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-018",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-018",
      "url": "[https://www.ethos.network/post/ethos-is-live-on-base-mainnet](https://www.ethos.network/post/ethos-is-live-on-base-mainnet)",
      "title": "Ethos is LIVE on Base Mainnet",
      "publisher": "Ethos Network (official site)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GPT-SRC-019",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-019",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1801555991957275008](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1801555991957275008)",
      "title": "First 400 wallets and interactions win $50 ! Starting a $50 SOL to ...",
      "publisher": "X (formerly Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-001",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-001",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi](https://x.com/rami_hashimi)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi (@rami_hashimi) on X",
      "publisher": "X Corp (Twitter)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-002",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-002",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25578069478569](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25578069478569)",
      "title": "$3.7 MILLION… Gone. In. A. Flash. 😱 Rami Al-Hashimi lost",
      "publisher": "Binance Square (third-party post by @SlumDog)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-003",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-003",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1980987205310173260](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1980987205310173260)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi BTC giveaway post Oct 22 2025",
      "publisher": "X Corp",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-004",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-004",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1980783057939624422](https://x.com/rami_hashimi/status/1980783057939624422)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi Barron Trump Lamborghini post",
      "publisher": "X Corp",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-005",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-005",
      "url": "[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10/crypto-crash-leads-to-customer-bail-ins-to-prevent-some-exchanges-from-failing.html](https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10/crypto-crash-leads-to-customer-bail-ins-to-prevent-some-exchanges-from-failing.html)",
      "title": "Crypto Crash Leads to Customer Bail-Ins",
      "publisher": "Naked Capitalism",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-006",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-006",
      "url": "[https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Rami-Al-hashimi/11426619996](https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Rami-Al-hashimi/11426619996)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi – RAKA Design profile (ZoomInfo)",
      "publisher": "ZoomInfo",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-007",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-007",
      "url": "[https://rocketreach.co/rami-al-hashimi-email_46695033](https://rocketreach.co/rami-al-hashimi-email_46695033)",
      "title": "Rami Al-Hashimi – Innovators Consulting Engineers (RocketReach)",
      "publisher": "RocketReach",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-008",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-008",
      "url": "[https://x.com/rami_alhashimi](https://x.com/rami_alhashimi)",
      "title": "Rami Khan Al Hashimi (@rami_alhashimi) – X profile",
      "publisher": "X Corp",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-009",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-009",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en-IN/square/post/25605564974930](https://www.binance.com/en-IN/square/post/25605564974930)",
      "title": "$3.7 MILLION GONE IN SECONDS – Rami Al-Hashimi (Binance Square IN)",
      "publisher": "Binance Square (third-party post)",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GROK-SRC-010",
      "original_source_id": "SRC-010",
      "url": "[https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi)",
      "title": "Ethos Network profile – rami_hashimi (attempted fetch)",
      "publisher": "Ethos Network",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1",
      "original_source_id": "src_binance_sq_1",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25652598562873](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25652598562873)",
      "title": "Minus $3.7 million in seconds: the tragedy of trader Rami | Kamol_1313 on Binance Square",
      "publisher": "Binance Square",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2",
      "original_source_id": "src_binance_sq_2",
      "url": "[https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25573880822498](https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/25573880822498)",
      "title": "$3.7 MILLION — A Dream Turned Into Ashes This isn't ju | AlphaX Crypto on Binance Square",
      "publisher": "Binance Square",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GEMINI-src_ccn",
      "original_source_id": "src_ccn",
      "url": "[https://www.ccn.com/analysis/crypto/kanye-west-yzy-token-rug-pull/](https://www.ccn.com/analysis/crypto/kanye-west-yzy-token-rug-pull/)",
      "title": "Kanye West Unveils YZY Token Amid Insider Trading and Rug Pull Rumors - CCN.com",
      "publisher": "CCN",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GEMINI-src_99bitcoins",
      "original_source_id": "src_99bitcoins",
      "url": "[https://99bitcoins.com/news/altcoins/curse-of-the-crypto-nerd-is-barron-trump-struggling-to-fit-in-at-nyu/](https://99bitcoins.com/news/altcoins/curse-of-the-crypto-nerd-is-barron-trump-struggling-to-fit-in-at-nyu/)",
      "title": "Barron Trump Crypto Superstar A Social Misfit? - 99Bitcoins",
      "publisher": "99Bitcoins",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    },
    {
      "source_id": "GEMINI-src_deepdive",
      "original_source_id": "src_deepdive",
      "url": "[https://thedeepdive.ca/blackrock-crypto-transfers-are-redemptions-not-dumps-analysts-say/](https://thedeepdive.ca/blackrock-crypto-transfers-are-redemptions-not-dumps-analysts-say/)",
      "title": "BlackRock Crypto Transfers Are Redemptions, Not Dumps, Analysts Say | the deep dive",
      "publisher": "The Deep Dive",
      "accessed_date": "2026-02-21",
      "found_by": [
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "excerpt": ""
    }
  ],
  "third_party_reputation_scores": [
    {
      "platform": "ethos.network",
      "score": null,
      "score_type": "credibility",
      "reviews_positive": null,
      "reviews_negative": null,
      "reviews_neutral": null,
      "notable_review_texts": [],
      "vouch_count": null,
      "vouch_eth_staked": null,
      "slash_count": null,
      "url": "[https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/rami_hashimi)",
      "source_id": "CLAUDE-SRC-002",
      "notes": "Multiple research outputs stated that the Ethos profile and/or Ethos API endpoints were not accessible in the research environment, or returned errors, so the credibility score and review/vouch/slash metrics could not be retrieved."
    }
  ],
  "identity": {
    "verified_name": "Rami Al-Hashimi",
    "handles": [
      "@rami_hashimi (primary, joined 2013-08-04), variants like @RAMMI_HASHIMI_",
      {
        "platform": "X",
        "handle": "rami_hashimi",
        "url": "[https://x.com/rami_hashimi?lang=en](https://x.com/rami_hashimi?lang=en)",
        "notes": "High-confidence linkage to the persona referenced in this dossier."
      },
      "@rami_alhashimi"
    ],
    "email_addresses": [],
    "locations": [
      "UAE (profile flag 🇦🇪)",
      "India (per X account signals, unconfirmed by posts or other sources)",
      {
        "location": "Unverified; X UI displays profile metadata (not reliably extractable without authenticated access in this environment).",
        "confidence": "low"
      }
    ],
    "verification_status": "low",
    "source_ids": [
      "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
      "GPT-SRC-001",
      "GPT-SRC-002",
      "GROK-SRC-001"
    ],
    "disambiguation_notes": [
      {
        "description": "Distinct individual with same name is a Saudi engineering consultant with no crypto ties.",
        "source_ids": []
      },
      {
        "description": "A separate person named Rami Al-Hashimi exists: Founder & Designer of RAKA Design (architectural firm), previously General Manager at Innovators Consulting Engineers, Saudi Arabia. Holds Bachelor of Architectural Engineering from King Abdulaziz University (1991-1996). Also has handle @rami_alhashimi on X (Jeddah, inactive).",
        "source_ids": [
          "GROK-SRC-006",
          "GROK-SRC-007",
          "GROK-SRC-008"
        ],
        "verdict": "DIFFERENT PERSON – the architect and the @rami_hashimi crypto account are distinct individuals. The architect's LinkedIn/ZoomInfo record is the only professionally documented Rami Al-Hashimi found."
      },
      {
        "description": "The DOJ case involves a different person (Mohammad David Hashimi).",
        "source_ids": [],
        "verdict": "NO CONNECTION – different first name, different context."
      }
    ],
    "geo_flag_discrepancy": {
      "profile_display": "🇦🇪 UAE flag emoji used in display name and profile",
      "x_reported_location": "India (per disambiguation hint provided by requester)",
      "assessment": "High-confidence red flag: account self-presents as UAE-affiliated but X's geo-location signals India. This discrepancy is a classic pattern in accounts that manufacture a Gulf/MENA premium credibility for crypto audiences while operating out of a lower-cost location.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ]
    }
  },
  "credentials_and_claims": [
    {
      "claim": "Expert crypto trader capable of dominating the market and calling 100x memecoins",
      "source": "Self-proclaimed via bio and posts",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Self-proclaimed via bio and posts; no independent verification of consistent profitable track record or professional trading credentials. Publicized 99.79% portfolio wipeout contradicts expertise claims.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "notes": "Claim framed as an implied expertise signal via profile/bio and posting style. Contradicted by (a) a catastrophic loss narrative and (b) multiple unverified extreme PnL claims without primary account records.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-003"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-003"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Made $1 million from $Lobstar memecoin purchase ($5k to $1M)",
      "source": "X post by @rami_hashimi",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Posted with screenshot/video; community replies flag wallet as 'view only' on chain explorers suggesting possible fabricated proof. No on-chain confirmation of ownership or realization of gains.",
      "verification_status": "disputed",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "notes": "Dispute is based on community replies/analyst interpretation of the posted wallet view. No attributable wallet proof is provided in the captured evidence.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-005"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-005"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Technical/developer background or project involvement",
      "source": "Implied/assumed by persona; searched externally",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "No GitHub, LinkedIn, education records, or code contributions found linking to crypto development. Distinct individual with same name is a Saudi engineering consultant with no crypto ties.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "notes": "This is primarily an absence-of-evidence finding (evidence gap).",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-006",
        "GROK-SRC-007"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "claim": "Born in 1980; age stated as 44 at the time of posting.",
      "source": "X post by @rami_hashimi",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "This is a self-assertion on X. No independent corroboration located in accessible public registries or professional profiles within the research constraints.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "notes": "Treated as self-report only.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-003"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-003"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Achieved a trading profit of approximately $4,0,000 by longing \"$PUMP\" at a bottom.",
      "source": "X post by @rami_hashimi",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Self-reported trading result; no verifiable brokerage statements, on-chain proof, or independently auditable account data provided in the source.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "notes": "No primary account evidence available in the research artifacts.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-004"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Suffered a loss event described as turning $4,0,000 into $0 and stated an intention to leave.",
      "source": "X post by @rami_hashimi; amplified by Binance Square write-ups",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "The post exists, but the underlying financial event is not independently verifiable from the post alone. Secondary write-ups on Binance Square exist but appear to rest on the same social media narrative rather than primary account records.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "notes": "Multiple downstream posts appear derivative rather than providing primary evidence (exchange statement screenshots were referenced in some summaries but not independently validated within the artifact).",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-006",
        "GPT-SRC-007"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-005",
        "SRC-006",
        "SRC-007"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Operates as a crypto trading and airdrop-oriented influencer, including repeated requests for wallet addresses and giveaway-style promotions.",
      "source": "Multiple X posts soliciting addresses",
      "verified": true,
      "verification_evidence": "Multiple primary posts solicit wallet addresses for purported airdrops or giveaways.",
      "verification_status": "verified",
      "confidence": "high",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT",
        "Claude",
        "Grok"
      ],
      "notes": "The fact of solicitation is verified; fulfillment of promised distributions is not verified.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-008",
        "SRC-009",
        "SRC-010",
        "SRC-011",
        "SRC-013",
        "SRC-019"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Warns about non-paying \"reply with your SOL address\" airdrop posts.",
      "source": "X post by @rami_hashimi",
      "verified": true,
      "verification_evidence": "The post explicitly criticizes the pattern of address-collection airdrop posts that do not send tokens.",
      "verification_status": "verified",
      "confidence": "high",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "notes": "This creates an internal contradiction risk when paired with the subject's own address-solicitation posts, absent payout evidence.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-012"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-012"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Amplified rumor example (third-party site quoting the subject): a sponsored market update article quotes an X post attributed to the subject asserting that a public figure bought Zcash.",
      "source": "InsideBitcoins sponsored article",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "The article does not evidence the claim independently, and the source appears to be the X post itself.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "notes": "This is presented as an example of misinformation propagation risk rather than an independently verified falsehood.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-015"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-015"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "Coordinated-style promo of YZY token with similar giveaway patterns across accounts; accusations of fake giveaways/proofs",
      "source": "CCN analysis article and inferred patterning",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Identified by a third-party article as part of a set of accounts posting similar engagement-farming content around YZY token; the dossier does not include primary proof of coordination beyond the third-party characterization.",
      "verification_status": "unverified",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "notes": "Downstream risk characterization depends materially on the CCN article framing.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-006",
        "GEMINI-src_ccn"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-006",
        "src_ccn"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim": "X/Twitter reportedly geolocates server activity to India.",
      "source": "Narrative research output (not backed by a specific, accessible primary source in the provided artifacts)",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Explicitly described as a research hint and not independently confirmed by captured sources. Multiple outputs treat it as a suspicious discrepancy but also note access/metadata limitations.",
      "verification_status": "disputed",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "Grok",
        "Gemini",
        "Claude"
      ],
      "notes": "This is treated as a red-flag hypothesis rather than a confirmed fact within the provided evidence. Included because it was asserted in the research outputs.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "claim": "Follower count shown on X UI: ~137,600 as of research date; also described as ~162k+ followers in another output.",
      "source": "X UI observation (not stable, subject to change) and narrative summaries",
      "verified": false,
      "verification_evidence": "Conflicting reported follower counts across outputs; no single frozen snapshot provided in the artifacts that reconciles the exact number.",
      "verification_status": "disputed",
      "confidence": "low",
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Grok"
      ],
      "notes": "The precise number is treated as unstable metadata; the overall pattern of a large following is consistent across outputs.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    }
  ],
  "project_history": [
    {
      "name": "None identified as founder/developer",
      "period": "N/A",
      "description": "No evidence of founding, launching, or developing any crypto projects, tokens, DAOs, or startups. Operates solely as social media influencer and memecoin trader/shiller.",
      "funding": "N/A",
      "outcome": "N/A - no projects to evaluate",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "N/A",
      "team_members": [],
      "controversies": [
        "No rugs or exits as no projects owned"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X profile/posts review (as described in research outputs)"
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Crypto Twitter Influencer / Memecoin Shiller",
      "period": "2013-present",
      "description": "Builds audience via hype posts, \"next 100x\" teases (DM for access), engagement farming giveaways, and market commentary. Public examples include calls on $penguin, $clawd, $PUNCH analysis, AI/meta tokens.",
      "funding": "N/A",
      "outcome": "Audience growth to 162k+ followers; no verifiable sustained alpha or fund delivery; multiple \"I quit crypto\" rage posts followed by return.",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "162k+ X followers; engagement per post often 300-800 likes but high reply skepticism",
      "team_members": [],
      "controversies": [
        "Coordinated-style promo of YZY token with similar giveaway patterns across accounts; accusations of fake giveaways/proofs"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X",
        "CCN"
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-006"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Airdrop and giveaway promotions (multi-token, multi-chain)",
      "period": "2024-2026 (observed in sampled posts; full back-catalog not exhaustively enumerated)",
      "description": "A recurring pattern of posts promising token distributions or cash-equivalent rewards to respondents who like, repost, and share wallet addresses, including Solana and Ethereum addresses.",
      "funding": "N/A",
      "outcome": "Unverified fulfillment. The public record available here shows solicitation and promises, but not independently auditable proof of distributions at scale.",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "Follower count shown on X UI (not treated as a stable metric due to access limitations); posts show high engagement counts in some instances.",
      "team_members": [],
      "controversies": [
        "Potential address-harvesting risk pattern: repeated requests for wallet addresses with conditional promises.",
        "Credibility ambiguity: the same account also criticizes non-paying airdrop posts, creating a contradiction risk without independent proof of fulfillment."
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X posts"
      ],
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-012",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-008",
        "SRC-009",
        "SRC-010",
        "SRC-011",
        "SRC-012",
        "SRC-013",
        "SRC-019"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "$CR7 promotion context (contract address surfaced in search results)",
      "period": "Undated within this dossier (search result page observed on access date)",
      "description": "An X search results page includes a pairing of \"$CR7\" with the Ethereum address 0x2a036c8c7d10a012f71dd23a8ef6347d2e6b4444 in the query context.",
      "funding": "Not available.",
      "outcome": "Not determinable from the search results page alone. No direct, primary post by the subject is captured in the accessible sources here confirming ownership, deployment, or financial involvement with the address.",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "Not available.",
      "team_members": [],
      "controversies": [
        "Insufficient linkage evidence: presence of a contract address in an X search results page is not proof of authorship, control, or promotion by the subject without the underlying post context."
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X search results page"
      ],
      "confidence": "low",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-014"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-014"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "YZY Token (Unofficial Kanye West Token)",
      "period": "August 2025",
      "description": "Promoted massive profit claims and promised giveaways for likes/retweets. The token was heavily scrutinized amid insider trading and rug pull rumors.",
      "funding": "Not specified.",
      "outcome": "Promoted; scrutiny and rumors cited; no direct on-chain promoter attribution included beyond third-party reporting.",
      "tvl_or_metrics": "Not specified.",
      "team_members": [
        "@Edwardbayc",
        "@belfort_max",
        "@Godsburnt"
      ],
      "controversies": [
        "Insider trading and rug pull rumors.",
        "Identified by crypto analysts as a participant in a suspected rug pull ring for the YZY Token, leveraging his following to trap retail liquidity."
      ],
      "sources": [
        "CCN"
      ],
      "confidence": "medium",
      "source_ids": [
        "GEMINI-src_ccn",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-006"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "src_ccn",
        "SRC-006"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "timeline": [
    {
      "date": "2013-08",
      "title": "X account creation",
      "description": "@rami_hashimi account registered with current bio 'Follow Me to dominate the Crypto'.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "One output also states the join date is shown in the X UI as August 2013; another states joined 2013-08-04. Both treated as platform metadata, not identity proof.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GPT-SRC-002",
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-002"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2024-08",
      "title": "Airdrop and wallet-address solicitation activity observed",
      "description": "Posts include calls to drop Solana and Ethereum addresses for purported distributions and challenges.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "The solicitation behavior is directly observable in the referenced posts; payout fulfillment remains unverified.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-019"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-008",
        "SRC-010",
        "SRC-019"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2024-11-23",
      "title": "DOGE giveaway post",
      "description": "Posts DOGE giveaway: 'Finally reached $0.46! ...send 1,0,000 $DOGE (~$46,000) to one person by tomorrow. Just like, retweet and comment done.' Gets 826K views, 8K retweets.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "The engagement metrics and the quoted claim are from the narrative research output; the specific post URL is not provided in the artifacts beyond referencing the X profile surface. Included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "title": "PENGU airdrop/giveaway post",
      "description": "Posts PENGU airdrop giveaway: 'Finally Claimed my $3,0,000 $PENGU Airdrop! ...send 500,000 $PENGU (~$25,000) to one person by tomorrow.'",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "The claim is reported in the narrative research output; no direct URL provided in the artifacts beyond referencing the X profile surface. Included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-05",
      "title": "Self-asserted age and birth year",
      "description": "A post states the author was born in 1980 and is 44 at the time of posting.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "Self-report only.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-003"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-003"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-06",
      "title": "Major portfolio liquidation (version 1)",
      "description": "Lost $3.736M (-99.79% of portfolio) in single leveraged trade on Binance; publicly stated 'Three years of work... all destroyed. I will never return.'",
      "sources": [
        "Binance Square"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "One output states the liquidation occurred in June 2025. Another output treats the event date as unclear and flags that the Binance Square narrative may be derivative. A separate Gemini output specifies the date as 2025-06-13 and adds instrument details.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-003",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-003",
        "src_binance_sq_1",
        "src_binance_sq_2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-06-13",
      "title": "Catastrophic Liquidation (instrument detail version)",
      "description": "Lost $3,736,996.21 (-99.79% of his portfolio) in a matter of seconds. The loss was due to an over-leveraged long/short position on RESOLVUSDT perpetual futures on Binance. He publicly posted his final PNL, stating: 'Three years of work... all destroyed. I will never return.'",
      "sources": [
        "Binance Square"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "This is presented with high confidence in one output; other outputs explicitly state that primary account statements were not retrieved and that secondary write-ups appear derivative. Included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "src_binance_sq_1",
        "src_binance_sq_2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-09",
      "title": "Self-asserted $4,0,000 trading gain",
      "description": "A post claims a large gain from a leveraged position on \"$PUMP\".",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "Unverified self-report.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-004"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-10",
      "title": "Self-asserted catastrophic loss and exit statement (version 2)",
      "description": "A post claims turning $4,0,000 into $0 and states being done. Binance Square posts amplify a narrative of a roughly $3.7 million liquidation but do not provide primary account statements.",
      "sources": [
        "X",
        "Binance Square"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "This conflicts with another timeline that places the liquidation in June 2025. Included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-006",
        "GPT-SRC-007"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-005",
        "SRC-006",
        "SRC-007"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-10-10",
      "title": "Tweet cited in Naked Capitalism article",
      "description": "Tweet cited in Naked Capitalism article on crypto market crash and auto-deleveraging; tweet used as illustrative color, not as expert commentary. Indicates account was posting actively during October 2025 market event.",
      "sources": [
        "Naked Capitalism"
      ],
      "tone": "neutral",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "The specific embedded tweet content is not reproduced in the provided artifact beyond this description. Included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-005"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-005"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-10-21",
      "title": "Barron Trump Lamborghini engagement-bait post",
      "description": "Posts engagement-bait questioning whether Barron Trump is 'the biggest scammer of crypto' referencing a Lamborghini.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "Included as stated; the post URL exists in the Grok source registry.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-004"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-10",
      "title": "Fake/ misleading gold deposit post",
      "description": "Posted 'BREAKING: Gold prices plunging after largest gold deposit discovered in Africa (10% global supply boost)'. Widely called out as fabricated FUD or engagement bait in crypto communities.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "The community backlash is described in the research output; primary post URL is included.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-004"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-10-22",
      "title": "BTC giveaway post",
      "description": "Posts BTC giveaway: 'If I send you 1 $BTC worth $113,0, will it change your life? First 1000 to interact.' Gets 186.8K views.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "Engagement metrics are from the narrative research output; included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-003"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-003"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-11",
      "title": "First documented 'I quit crypto' post",
      "description": "Posted 'CRYPTO IS A SCAM... I QUIT AND I'M NOT COMING BACK THIS TIME' amid market conditions.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "No direct URL provided for this specific post in the artifacts; included as described.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2025-11-13",
      "title": "InsideBitcoins sponsored market update quoting attributed post",
      "description": "A sponsored market update article quotes an X post attributed to the subject asserting that a public figure bought Zcash. The article does not evidence the claim independently, and the source appears to be the X post itself.",
      "sources": [
        "InsideBitcoins"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "Included as an example of misinformation propagation risk.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-015"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-015"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-01",
      "title": "Second 'I quit crypto' post",
      "description": "Repeated near-identical rage-quit message despite continued activity.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "No direct URL provided for this specific post in the artifacts; included as described.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-01",
      "title": "BlackRock dumping claim (debunked framing)",
      "description": "In January 2026, he posted 'BREAKING: BLACKROCK IS DUMPING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS,' which analysts immediately debunked as standard ETF redemptions.",
      "sources": [
        "The Deep Dive"
      ],
      "tone": "critical",
      "verified": false,
      "notes": "The claim is presented in an output as an example of misinformation; the underlying X post URL is not included in the artifacts. Included as stated.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GEMINI-src_deepdive"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "src_deepdive"
      ]
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-02",
      "title": "Ongoing activity",
      "description": "Active daily posting: giveaway farming (SOL sends, debt payoff, birthday $5k $ETG airdrops), 'next 100x DM me', bullish market calls, Trump/BTC hype. High engagement but replies full of scam accusations and skepticism.",
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "tone": "warning",
      "verified": true,
      "notes": "Specific examples and exact posts are not fully enumerated in the artifacts, beyond the referenced giveaway/airdrop posts and the Lobstar claim post.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-005"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-005"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "red_flags": [
    {
      "title": "Classic engagement-farming playbook with unverifiable giveaways",
      "description": "Frequent posts promising SOL/ETH sends, debt payoffs, or random airdrops to likers/retweeters/commenters. No public on-chain proof of fulfillment at scale; community accuses fakes. Standard tactic to inflate metrics and appear generous while harvesting data/engagement.",
      "severity": "high",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Multiple posts promising $12k SOL, $5k ETH, 'pay your debt' wallet drops, 'first 444 interact'",
        "Multiple primary posts solicit addresses and promise distributions.",
        "Some posts encourage interactions (like, repost, comment) as a condition.",
        "Repeatedly posts large-denomination giveaway announcements (1M DOGE, 500K PENGU, 1 BTC) with 'like, retweet, comment done' mechanics and a countdown timer. These are canonical giveaway scam patterns. No evidence any giveaway was ever executed."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "The subject posts criticism of address-collection airdrop posts that do not pay (possible attempt to distinguish themselves), but no independent payout evidence is provided in the artifacts."
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT",
        "Grok"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X posts and profile surface",
        "Narrative research output describing giveaway mechanics and engagement metrics"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019",
        "GROK-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-003"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-005",
        "SRC-008",
        "SRC-009",
        "SRC-010",
        "SRC-011",
        "SRC-013",
        "SRC-019",
        "SRC-003"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Unverifiable profit claims and possible fake trading proofs",
      "description": "$1M Lobstar claim uses screenshot flagged as 'view only wallet' by analysts. Pattern of hyping wins after documented massive loss without audited track record.",
      "severity": "high",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Lobstar post analysis; community replies on chain tools",
        "Self-reported $4,0,000 gain claim.",
        "Self-reported $4,0,000 to $0 loss claim."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "No definitive on-chain attribution to the subject was retrieved in the artifacts, so falsity cannot be proven from these materials alone."
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "GPT"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X",
        "Binance Square (derivative amplification alleged)"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-004",
        "GPT-SRC-005"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-005",
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Narrative shifts and repeated rage-quits",
      "description": "Posts declaring crypto a scam and permanent exit (2025-11, 2026-01) followed immediately by return to heavy shilling and hype. Indicates emotional/inconsistent behavior or manipulation for sympathy/attention.",
      "severity": "medium",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Multiple identical quit posts while account remains highly active",
        "Despite dramatically quitting the crypto space forever following his $3.7M liquidation in June 2025, he returned almost immediately to promote highly risky meme coins and coordinate engagement farms."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X",
        "Binance Square",
        "CCN"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1",
        "GEMINI-src_ccn"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "src_binance_sq_1",
        "src_ccn"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Potential coordinated misleading promotion (YZY token)",
      "description": "One of several large accounts posting identical-style profit/giveaway claims around Kanye YZY token launch amid rug/insider concerns.",
      "severity": "medium",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "CCN report listing @rami_hashimi among similar accounts",
        "Identified by crypto analysts as a participant in a suspected rug pull ring for the YZY Token, leveraging his following to trap retail liquidity."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "No primary on-chain or direct coordination evidence is included in the artifacts beyond the third-party article framing."
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "CCN"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-006",
        "GEMINI-src_ccn"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-006",
        "src_ccn"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Spreading unverified market-moving claims",
      "description": "Africa gold deposit 'breaking news' post called fake/desparate by multiple communities; fits pattern of FUD/hype for engagement or positioning.",
      "severity": "medium",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Post content and community backlash"
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [],
      "found_by": [
        "Claude"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-004"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-004"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Misinformation propagation risk (example: celebrity purchase assertion)",
      "description": "A third-party article reproduces an assertion attributed to the subject about a celebrity buying a specific cryptoasset. The article provides no independent documentation of the purchase and appears to rely on the social post itself, increasing misinformation risk.",
      "severity": "medium",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Sponsored market update article quoting the subject's post without independent corroboration."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [],
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "InsideBitcoins"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-015"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-015"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Internal contradiction risk: criticizes non-paying airdrop posts while using similar mechanics",
      "description": "The subject posts criticism of address-collection airdrop posts that do not pay, yet also publishes multiple posts that request addresses for promised distributions. Without independent proof of payouts, this creates an unresolved credibility conflict.",
      "severity": "medium",
      "confidence": "high",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Critical post about non-paying address-collection airdrops.",
        "Multiple posts requesting addresses for purported payouts."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "It is possible the subject does pay out; the research outputs explicitly note that payout proof was not obtained."
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "GPT"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "X"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-012",
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-012",
        "SRC-008",
        "SRC-009",
        "SRC-010",
        "SRC-011"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Identity/Location Obfuscation",
      "description": "Mismatch between the outward Middle Eastern branding (UAE flag, Arabic text) and internal platform signals pointing to India. Signals indicate the account is a facade for a commercial engagement farming operation rather than a genuine individual.",
      "severity": "high",
      "confidence": "low",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "Uses a United Arab Emirates flag (🇦🇪) and an Arabic name.",
        "X backend reportedly links the account origin/location to India (as noted in research hints).",
        "Conclusion framed as \"High likelihood of geographic spoofing or a purchased account used for engagement farming.\""
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "Multiple outputs explicitly state the India linkage was not independently confirmed in captured sources and may rely on a research hint or inaccessible metadata."
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Grok",
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "Narrative output statements; no dedicated primary URL provided for the India linkage"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "title": "False Statements & Fake News",
      "description": "Repeatedly posts easily debunked misinformation to trigger viral algorithms. For example, in October 2025, he falsely claimed Barron Trump dumped $WLFI to buy a '$500M yacht' while shorting the market with 10x leverage. In January 2026, he posted 'BREAKING: BLACKROCK IS DUMPING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS,' which analysts immediately debunked as standard ETF redemptions.",
      "severity": "critical",
      "confidence": "low",
      "supporting_evidence": [
        "99Bitcoins referenced as supporting evidence for the Barron Trump allegation example.",
        "The Deep Dive referenced as supporting evidence for the BlackRock transfers/redemptions framing."
      ],
      "counter_evidence": [
        "The underlying X post URLs are not included in the artifacts, so the exact text and attribution cannot be independently checked from these materials alone."
      ],
      "found_by": [
        "Gemini"
      ],
      "sources": [
        "99Bitcoins",
        "The Deep Dive"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GEMINI-src_99bitcoins",
        "GEMINI-src_deepdive"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "src_99bitcoins",
        "src_deepdive"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "behavioral_patterns": [
    {
      "title": "High-volume engagement bait under pressure or market dips",
      "description": "When market is down or after personal loss, shifts to massive giveaway promises and 'changing lives' framing. Under criticism, ignores or deletes rather than address (e.g., 'this tweet will be deleted in 16hrs').",
      "examples": [
        "Post-loss return to 'GM I'll pay your debt'; 'Interact now or regret'; 'I know next 100x but DM only' teases"
      ],
      "frequency": "Recurring; described as frequent/high-volume across sampled posts",
      "confidence": "high",
      "sources": [
        "X profile/posts review as described"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Overpromising alpha while delivering typical CT noise",
      "description": "Claims insider 100x knowledge but directs to DM (paywall-like); public analysis often generic bullish ('retail coming', 'bullish than you imagine').",
      "examples": [
        "'$PUNCH is scam... LOL YOU FUCKING WISH - this is setup for higher' contradictory flip; frequent 'breaking' hype"
      ],
      "frequency": "Recurring",
      "confidence": "high",
      "sources": [
        "X profile/posts review as described"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Engagement-gated financial promises",
      "description": "Promises of airdrops or monetary rewards are frequently conditioned on social engagement actions (like, repost, comment) and providing wallet addresses.",
      "examples": [
        "Requests for Solana addresses tied to airdrops and interaction thresholds.",
        "Requests for Ethereum addresses tied to giveaways and repost requirements."
      ],
      "frequency": "High-frequency across sampled posts",
      "confidence": "high",
      "sources": [
        "X posts"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-008",
        "SRC-009",
        "SRC-010",
        "SRC-011",
        "SRC-013",
        "SRC-019"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Narrative volatility in trading outcomes",
      "description": "The public persona includes dramatic claims of extreme wins followed by extreme losses and exit statements. This can be a hallmark of high-risk trading behavior, attention capture, or both. Verification is limited by lack of primary account evidence.",
      "examples": [
        "Claim of large profit on a specific trade.",
        "Claim of total loss and departure."
      ],
      "frequency": "Observed at least twice in sampled claims (profit claim; loss claim) plus third-party amplification",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "sources": [
        "X posts; Binance Square amplification"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-004",
        "GPT-SRC-005",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-003"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-004",
        "SRC-005",
        "SRC-003"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "contradictions_and_disputes": [
    {
      "claim_1": "Lost $3.736M (-99.79% of portfolio) in June 2025 in a single leveraged trade on Binance; publicly stated 'Three years of work... all destroyed. I will never return.'",
      "claim_2": "Self-asserted catastrophic loss and exit statement placed in October 2025 (turning $4,0,000 into $0) with Binance Square amplification, but no primary account statements.",
      "source_1": "Binance Square (as cited in one output); June 2025 timeline entry",
      "source_2": "X post and Binance Square write-ups; October 2025 timeline entry",
      "resolution": "Unknown from provided artifacts. Date and specifics vary by output; multiple outputs note lack of primary account records.",
      "confidence": "low",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-003",
        "GPT-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-006",
        "GPT-SRC-007",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-003",
        "SRC-005",
        "SRC-006",
        "SRC-007",
        "src_binance_sq_1",
        "src_binance_sq_2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim_1": "Uses UAE flag emoji and Arabic name, implying UAE association.",
      "claim_2": "X/Twitter reportedly geolocates server activity to India / platform signals point to India.",
      "source_1": "X profile presentation as described in outputs",
      "source_2": "Research hint / narrative assertion; described as unconfirmed by posts or other sources",
      "resolution": "Unknown from provided artifacts. Included as a flagged discrepancy, but explicitly not independently confirmed in the captured evidence.",
      "confidence": "low",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "claim_1": "Audience growth to 162k+ followers (Claude output).",
      "claim_2": "~137.6K followers (narrative output) / ~137,600 as of research date (narrative output).",
      "source_1": "X UI observation summarized in Claude output",
      "source_2": "X UI observation summarized in narrative output",
      "resolution": "Unknown from provided artifacts. Likely reflects different sampling times or approximate readings; treated as unstable metadata.",
      "confidence": "low",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    },
    {
      "claim_1": "No Ethos profile exists or is accessible for this handle.",
      "claim_2": "Ethos profile URL is listed as a source, but access errors prevented retrieval of score and review data.",
      "source_1": "Research output statements about Ethos status",
      "source_2": "Listed Ethos profile URLs and evidence gaps describing access constraints",
      "resolution": "Unknown. Within provided artifacts, the Ethos score fields are null because the profile/API could not be accessed; existence versus accessibility is unresolved.",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-002",
        "GPT-SRC-016",
        "GPT-SRC-017",
        "GROK-SRC-010"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-002",
        "SRC-016",
        "SRC-017",
        "SRC-010"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim_1": "No projects built, no code, no credentials, no audited P&L; pure social media persona with zero verifiable substance.",
      "claim_2": "Promoter role for YZY token and coordinated networks to cross-promote unverified tokens and offer fake giveaways.",
      "source_1": "Claude and GPT outputs (no projects identified)",
      "source_2": "Gemini output (YZY promoter role; coordinated networks)",
      "resolution": "Not mutually exclusive. It may mean no owned/founded projects, but promotional activity for others. Remains partly unverified because promoter attribution is largely third-party reporting.",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-006",
        "GEMINI-src_ccn"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": [
        "SRC-001",
        "SRC-006",
        "src_ccn"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim_1": "overall_score / risk score reported as 68.",
      "claim_2": "overall_score / risk score reported as 72.",
      "source_1": "Claude risk_assessment.overall_score",
      "source_2": "GPT risk_assessment.overall_score",
      "resolution": "Median of reported scores is 70, used as consolidated overall_score and risk_assessment.overall_score.",
      "confidence": "high",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GPT-SRC-001"
      ],
      "as_reported_source_ids": []
    }
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    {
      "question": "What is the verified legal identity, passport/corporate records, and exact location/residence?",
      "why_uncertain": "Only X self-presentation; no LinkedIn, company filings, or KYC-linked data. UAE flag vs India signals conflict.",
      "searched": "LinkedIn, company registries, web searches for personal details",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-006",
        "GROK-SRC-007"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "Proof of actual giveaway distributions or large wallet transactions matching claims?",
      "why_uncertain": "No public tx hashes or explorer links provided; replies demand proof but none surfaced.",
      "searched": "X posts, replies, on-chain mentions",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "Any past employment, education, or pre-crypto career?",
      "why_uncertain": "Zero mentions or records; distinct same-name professional exists but unrelated.",
      "searched": "LinkedIn, GitHub, education searches, web archives",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-006",
        "GROK-SRC-007",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "Farcaster/Warpcast presence or other on-chain identity linkage?",
      "why_uncertain": "No hits in searches; Ethos API returned not found.",
      "searched": "Farcaster searches, Ethos API",
      "source_ids": [
        "GROK-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-016",
        "GPT-SRC-017"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "Ethos reputation profile fields: credibility_score, vouch_count, vouch_eth_staked, reviews_positive, reviews_negative, reviews_neutral, slash_count, and top reviews",
      "why_uncertain": "The requested Ethos app and API endpoints could not be opened directly in this environment due to URL access constraints. Only Ethos API documentation and general Ethos posts were accessible.",
      "searched": "Ethos API documentation and internal endpoint listings; attempted direct app/API access blocked by tool safety constraints.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-016",
        "GPT-SRC-017",
        "GPT-SRC-018",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-002",
        "GROK-SRC-010"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "On-chain wallet ownership and transaction footprint (EVM and Solana addresses tied to the subject)",
      "why_uncertain": "The subject solicits addresses but does not provide verifiable, persistent wallet identifiers in the captured primary sources that can be confidently attributed as owned or controlled by the subject.",
      "searched": "Queries for 0x strings and contract addresses in accessible posts and search pages; only low-confidence context was found.",
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-014",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-005",
        "GROK-SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "question": "Education and employment verification (degrees, employers, titles, tenure)",
      "why_uncertain": "No high-confidence LinkedIn profile or employer confirmation was retrieved in accessible search results.",
      "searched": "Web searches for LinkedIn and professional mentions; no authoritative profile captured.",
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GROK-SRC-006",
        "GROK-SRC-007"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "key_insights": [
    {
      "title": "Pure social media persona with zero verifiable substance",
      "description": "No projects built, no code, no credentials, no audited P&L. Success metric is follower count and engagement farming, not delivery or transparency.",
      "importance": "critical",
      "evidence": [
        "No evidence of founding, launching, or developing any crypto projects, tokens, DAOs, or startups.",
        "No GitHub, LinkedIn, education records, or code contributions found linking to crypto development.",
        "Behavioral emphasis on giveaways, airdrops, and engagement-gated promises."
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Matches textbook crypto Twitter grifter archetype",
      "description": "Leverage gambler with publicized wipeout who returns to hype unverifiable wins, farm engagement with giveaways, tease paid signals, and flip narratives. High risk of leading followers into poor trades or emotional decisions.",
      "importance": "high",
      "evidence": [
        "Lost $3.736M (-99.79% of portfolio) in single leveraged trade on Binance (as described).",
        "Unverifiable profit claims (e.g., Lobstar $5k to $1M; $PUMP multi-million profit claim).",
        "Frequent engagement-farming giveaway mechanics and address solicitation without payout proof."
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-003",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-004",
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "The accessible record supports an influencer-style, engagement-gated giveaway and airdrop persona more strongly than any verifiable professional credential set",
      "description": "Multiple primary posts show repeated address solicitation and reward promises. By contrast, no independently verifiable education or employment history was located within accessible sources.",
      "importance": "high",
      "evidence": [
        "Multiple posts explicitly request Solana/Ethereum addresses for purported distributions.",
        "No high-confidence LinkedIn profile, employer page, or independent credential verification found in accessible research surfaces."
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011",
        "GPT-SRC-013",
        "GPT-SRC-019",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-001"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Financial performance narratives are high-impact but not independently auditable from available evidence",
      "description": "Claims of multi-million-dollar gains and losses exist as posts and are repeated in secondary content that appears derivative. Absent primary account records or on-chain identity proofs, these should be treated as unverified narratives.",
      "importance": "high",
      "evidence": [
        "Self-reported $4,0,000 gain claim on $PUMP.",
        "Self-reported $4,0,000 to $0 loss claim.",
        "Binance Square posts repeat a liquidation narrative but do not present primary account evidence (as described in outputs)."
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-004",
        "GPT-SRC-005",
        "GPT-SRC-006",
        "GPT-SRC-007",
        "CLAUDE-SRC-003",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_1",
        "GEMINI-src_binance_sq_2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Credibility tension: condemns non-paying address-collection airdrops while employing similar mechanics",
      "description": "The subject explicitly criticizes address-collection airdrops that do not pay, yet repeatedly requests addresses for promised distributions. Without proof of payouts, this contradiction increases reputational risk.",
      "importance": "high",
      "evidence": [
        "Post explicitly criticizing non-paying SOL-address airdrop posts.",
        "Multiple posts requesting SOL/ETH addresses for purported payouts."
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "GPT-SRC-012",
        "GPT-SRC-008",
        "GPT-SRC-009",
        "GPT-SRC-010",
        "GPT-SRC-011"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "risk_assessment": {
    "overall_score": 70,
    "score_reasoning": "Consolidated score is the median of the LLM-reported overall scores present in the provided artifacts (68 and 72), yielding 70. Risk drivers explicitly highlighted across outputs include: repeated engagement-gated wallet-address solicitations and giveaway-style promotions with no independently auditable evidence of fulfillment; unverified, extreme trading performance claims; a high-profile catastrophic loss narrative that (if accurate) contradicts implied trading expertise; misinformation propagation risk via sensationalist claims; and potential involvement in suspect token promotion ecosystems (YZY) per third-party reporting. Ethos credibility score and review/vouch/slash data are missing due to access constraints, increasing verification risk; therefore, the score reflects elevated uncertainty rather than an Ethos-anchored adjustment.",
    "criminal_risk": "low/none found",
    "financial_risk": "high",
    "reputational_risk": "high",
    "verification_risk": "high (identity and on-chain ownership not verified; Ethos data unavailable; many high-impact claims are self-reports or derivative write-ups)",
    "source_ids": [
      "CLAUDE-SRC-001",
      "CLAUDE-SRC-003",
      "CLAUDE-SRC-005",
      "CLAUDE-SRC-006",
      "GPT-SRC-008",
      "GPT-SRC-009",
      "GPT-SRC-010",
      "GPT-SRC-011",
      "GPT-SRC-012",
      "GPT-SRC-004",
      "GPT-SRC-005",
      "GPT-SRC-006",
      "GPT-SRC-007",
      "GEMINI-src_ccn",
      "GEMINI-src_deepdive",
      "GPT-SRC-015"
    ],
    "llm_reported_scores": [
      {
        "model": "Claude",
        "overall_score": 68,
        "source": "risk_assessment.overall_score field in Claude-provided JSON"
      },
      {
        "model": "GPT",
        "overall_score": 72,
        "source": "risk_assessment.overall_score field in GPT-provided JSON"
      },
      {
        "model": "Grok",
        "overall_score": null,
        "source": "No numeric overall_score reported in the provided Grok artifact"
      },
      {
        "model": "Gemini",
        "overall_score": null,
        "source": "No numeric overall_score reported in the provided Gemini artifact"
      }
    ]
  },
  "confidence_notes": {
    "data_completeness": "Low-to-medium. Many claims are present, but a substantial fraction are unverified due to missing primary records, missing on-chain attribution, and inaccessible Ethos profile/API outputs.",
    "source_verification": "Mixed. Primary X posts exist for solicitation behavior and some self-claims. Several high-impact narratives rely on third-party write-ups (Binance Square, InsideBitcoins, CCN, and others) that may be derivative or interpretive.",
    "identity_confidence": "Low. The online persona is linked to @rami_hashimi, but legal identity, location, and cross-platform corroboration are not established. Existence of other individuals with similar names increases disambiguation risk.",
    "timeline_confidence": "Medium for platform join date and the existence of specific referenced X posts; low for precise dating and details of liquidation events due to contradictions across outputs and lack of primary account records.",
    "conflicting_findings": "Notable conflicts include liquidation date and evidentiary strength (June 2025 with instrument details versus October 2025 framing; verified versus unverified treatment across outputs), disputed India geolocation claims, and differing follower counts.",
    "limitations": "Ethos reputation score and review/vouch data were not retrievable; on-chain wallet ownership was not established; full X history was not exhaustively enumerated; several claims lack direct post URLs in the artifacts; some assertions rely on narrative hints rather than captured primary evidence."
  }
}